Anonymous wrote:They are not 'willing to take one for the team." They want to get their kids out of wakefield and increase their property values. Wakefield isn't going to have 3,000 kids, WL is.
This is all about a wealthy area of south arlington trying to separate itself from the rest of south arlington where schools and resources are dominated by lower income family needs. I don't blame them and would do the same if I lived in that neighborhood.
Anonymous wrote:It looked to me like Stengel is doing the ES process and Nattress and Chadwick are the main staff on CC. They have to do both at the same time. There is a complete lack of leadership at the top though. WTF did the SB renew Murphy’s contract? Where is he in any of these conversations?
Anonymous wrote:The neighborhood is pushing for it because they don't want to send their kids to Wakefield. But, they want all the amenities of Wakefield.
Anonymous wrote:The neighborhood is pushing for it because they don't want to send their kids to Wakefield. But, they want all the amenities of Wakefield.
Anonymous wrote:It looked to me like Stengel is doing the ES process and Nattress and Chadwick are the main staff on CC. They have to do both at the same time. There is a complete lack of leadership at the top though. WTF did the SB renew Murphy’s contract? Where is he in any of these conversations?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. The people who are paying attention to the elementary boundary process aren't largely not the same people as who are paying attention to the high school process. Most of the people this elementary process would affect (people with K/1st graders and younger) aren't paying attention to high school because it's so far off and they figure people with older kids are paying attention to that, oblivious to the fact that an awful lot of those people aren't focused on it because their kids will be out or nearly out of APS by the time any of these seats are created.
Sadly, this is me. I have a 1 and 3 year old so I have made myself pay attention to elementary, but I only have so much bandwidth. I can't even keep up with this Career Center nonsense. So what's the deal? They are putting 800 seats there on the CIP but don't have an actual plan for what kind of focus it would be or rationale why anyone would choose to go there with no amenities? And also, it's short term? Again, this is my completely unresearched impression of the situation.
Anonymous wrote:The CC plan can't really get enacted in this CIP though, can it? It is prospective and visionary. We don't have the money in this CIP and there are other more urgent needs. The initial 800 seats at CC will go through, but I doubt any more than that before the CIP is voted out in June.
Anonymous wrote:No. The people who are paying attention to the elementary boundary process aren't largely not the same people as who are paying attention to the high school process. Most of the people this elementary process would affect (people with K/1st graders and younger) aren't paying attention to high school because it's so far off and they figure people with older kids are paying attention to that, oblivious to the fact that an awful lot of those people aren't focused on it because their kids will be out or nearly out of APS by the time any of these seats are created.