Anonymous wrote:My child applied to 9 and got into 8. We did not visit all of them until around now focusing on the more likely choices...and offered more aid. We were sort of amazed he got into 8! None were ivy league caliber.
Ironically, a higher stats kid may need to apply to more schools than a lower stats kid to be assured of getting in anywhere. For a high stats kid, the schools that may be a “match” for his/her credentials may also have admit rates of 10% or less. Schools where his/her credentials are in the 75th percentile may still only have an admit rate of 15-20%. The only schools that are really “safe” might not have the level of peer group he/she is looking for. So it would be really hard for the high stats kid to pick 7 schools that they would both have a reasonable chance of getting into, and that they would be excited to attend.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our guidance counselor recommended 8-10. I regret following that advice. It was a lot of work while child was trying to keep up with their schoolwork, have college interviews, etc.
It also made us consider schools we were somewhat lukewarm about. Oh, it it costs $ also (sending scores, application fees, visits).
I suggest you do 7: 2 reach, 3 target, and 2 safety. Use Naviance to keep you realistic. That is plenty.
My child--who is no superstar--has gotten into 5 already, and we have 3 more to hear from. That complicates the decision, and means we will be attending several "admitted students" days next month, while his high school is in session. 7 is plenty.
naviance must make race and recruiting status transparent if schools expect people to use it as a tool to accurately gauge the data.
i applied to 7 in 2001/2002. Today, my younger cousins and their friends are applying to 15-25.
This is true. The data in ours is all over the place. Without stats like race, recruits, course rigor, I can’t tell what’s what.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our guidance counselor recommended 8-10. I regret following that advice. It was a lot of work while child was trying to keep up with their schoolwork, have college interviews, etc.
It also made us consider schools we were somewhat lukewarm about. Oh, it it costs $ also (sending scores, application fees, visits).
I suggest you do 7: 2 reach, 3 target, and 2 safety. Use Naviance to keep you realistic. That is plenty.
My child--who is no superstar--has gotten into 5 already, and we have 3 more to hear from. That complicates the decision, and means we will be attending several "admitted students" days next month, while his high school is in session. 7 is plenty.
naviance must make race and recruiting status transparent if schools expect people to use it as a tool to accurately gauge the data.
i applied to 7 in 2001/2002. Today, my younger cousins and their friends are applying to 15-25.
Anonymous wrote:Our guidance counselor recommended 8-10. I regret following that advice. It was a lot of work while child was trying to keep up with their schoolwork, have college interviews, etc.
It also made us consider schools we were somewhat lukewarm about. Oh, it it costs $ also (sending scores, application fees, visits).
I suggest you do 7: 2 reach, 3 target, and 2 safety. Use Naviance to keep you realistic. That is plenty.
My child--who is no superstar--has gotten into 5 already, and we have 3 more to hear from. That complicates the decision, and means we will be attending several "admitted students" days next month, while his high school is in session. 7 is plenty.