Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Their 2017 QSR is pretty weak. http://www.dcpcsb.org/sites/default/files/report/2017-05-25%20WMST%20PCHS%20QSR%20_0.pdf
That's a pretty damning report.
Agree.
As an aside, I never understand why more people don't seem to use them or discuss them when considering a charter school. I wish DCPS produced something similar.
I don't think they're well publicized whatsoever. I only discovered them after having applied to PK3 lottery and wished I had seen them earlier. And I did a lot of research. The pdf with all the data comes up a lot (Tier and Parcc sheets) but I only found our about QSR buried in these boards. And I did a LOT of research!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Their 2017 QSR is pretty weak. http://www.dcpcsb.org/sites/default/files/report/2017-05-25%20WMST%20PCHS%20QSR%20_0.pdf
That's a pretty damning report.
Agree.
As an aside, I never understand why more people don't seem to use them or discuss them when considering a charter school. I wish DCPS produced something similar.
Anonymous wrote:Wild guess, seriously I know nothing about it but this is a public board, so guessing is fair game: Given where their campus sits, guessing many students are MD residents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are up for their 20 year review next Monday's mtg
So it's just perfunctory?
Anonymous wrote:They are up for their 20 year review next Monday's mtg
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Their 2017 QSR is pretty weak. http://www.dcpcsb.org/sites/default/files/report/2017-05-25%20WMST%20PCHS%20QSR%20_0.pdf
That's a pretty damning report.
Anonymous wrote:Their 2017 QSR is pretty weak. http://www.dcpcsb.org/sites/default/files/report/2017-05-25%20WMST%20PCHS%20QSR%20_0.pdf