Anonymous wrote:I think it would be helpful to complain to ARI about this situation. It might not help your child, OP, but it could send them on the path of fixing this for next year. If they don’t hear about these issues, they definitely won’t know to think about a fix.
Anonymous wrote:She came home from testing and said she was certain that when she began, the timer gave her only 6 minutes instead of the expected 10 for the first set of questions. Did this happen to anyone else? I asked about it at the school and the proctor told me the test timer would start if a child tapped, even accidentally, on their Chromebook and that she might have tapped something to go forward and then immediately back and been unaware that her timer was going while he gave directions. He said he couldn’t control the timer and he could see that at least one other student looked like they did the same thing. Nothing to be done.
I can accept this, but wonder if this biases the test against fidgety kids.
Fwiw, my daughter is attentive and quite certain that she did NOT tap while waiting through instructions... but she is 8. I didn’t want to quiz her about it too much and make her think it was a big deal, but I’m surprised to hear that kids have the possibility to sabotage a timed test this way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The same was true with the PARCC. When a child touched the plain background outside the questions test box window area, this would end the test and submit scores, even if a child would do it within the first seconds of the test.
That is why people practiced with the test not so much the content but sheer testing process
that was unnecessarily complicated for small children of whom many do not have much
experience with portable devices and testing process.
Kids were traumatized by fear not to click anywhere, some more then of the test itself.
It is important to know that a child did not go outside the testing window as the testing
window was covered the entire screen area, it was all about clicking outside
of the text box within the testing screen area.
Try to search this forum for PARCC and you might find similarities.
I don't know how parents or teachers solved this issue or approached it as I don't have
personal experience with this but you might gain some insight by searching the past posts.
Honestly, this is why we really should go back to paper and pencil tests. The teacher says "ready and ... go!" and everyone opens their test booklet and starts.
Anonymous wrote:The same was true with the PARCC. When a child touched the plain background outside the questions test box window area, this would end the test and submit scores, even if a child would do it within the first seconds of the test.
That is why people practiced with the test not so much the content but sheer testing process
that was unnecessarily complicated for small children of whom many do not have much
experience with portable devices and testing process.
Kids were traumatized by fear not to click anywhere, some more then of the test itself.
It is important to know that a child did not go outside the testing window as the testing
window was covered the entire screen area, it was all about clicking outside
of the text box within the testing screen area.
Try to search this forum for PARCC and you might find similarities.
I don't know how parents or teachers solved this issue or approached it as I don't have
personal experience with this but you might gain some insight by searching the past posts.
Anonymous wrote:Well I guess you already have your story for when your child doesn't get in. Oh the unfairness!
Anonymous wrote:Well I guess you already have your story for when your child doesn't get in. Oh the unfairness!
Anonymous wrote:It's a little ridiculous that they don't have a way of just starting the test on the chromebooks for all the kids at once. They're 8 years old; they're prone to hitting something by accident.
I'd bring it up with the school.