Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All I can tell you is that there has been non-stop construction and building at GMU for the last fifteen years. DD has lived as a student through four of those years. If it isn't libraries, or science halls, it's dorms and it's all state-of-the-art, so I'm happy (DD's dorm room looked like a hotel) - but the construction does wear on parents as you try to make your way into campus to pick up your child. https://president.gmu.edu/helping-virginia-become-the-best-educated-state/
They are probably fundraising to build, don’t you think?
I remember when UVA needed to restor the Rotunda because it was literally falling apart and the government didn’t want to chip in. It’s a tourist attraction and they didn’t think they should pay for restoring it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't worry. The subsidization of richer university students and their professors by lower income (on average) taxpayers continues unabated.
Because we certainly wouldn't want to make the Universities so inexpensive that the average tax payer could afford to go to one.
Spoken like the standard hypocritical liberal. We need to keep the regressive subsidy because this somehow benefits the average person paying the subsidy. If you want the average taxpayer to afford college, you should be thinking financial aid for poorer students, not subsidizing in-state tuition for all students, regardless of their ability to pay.
Anonymous wrote:"What sates are investing in thier public universities"
Hopefully yours!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't worry. The subsidization of richer university students and their professors by lower income (on average) taxpayers continues unabated.
Because we certainly wouldn't want to make the Universities so inexpensive that the average tax payer could afford to go to one.
Spoken like the standard hypocritical liberal. We need to keep the regressive subsidy because this somehow benefits the average person paying the subsidy. If you want the average taxpayer to afford college, you should be thinking financial aid for poorer students, not subsidizing in-state tuition for all students, regardless of their ability to pay.
Anonymous wrote:All I can tell you is that there has been non-stop construction and building at GMU for the last fifteen years. DD has lived as a student through four of those years. If it isn't libraries, or science halls, it's dorms and it's all state-of-the-art, so I'm happy (DD's dorm room looked like a hotel) - but the construction does wear on parents as you try to make your way into campus to pick up your child. https://president.gmu.edu/helping-virginia-become-the-best-educated-state/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't worry. The subsidization of richer university students and their professors by lower income (on average) taxpayers continues unabated.
Because we certainly wouldn't want to make the Universities so inexpensive that the average tax payer could afford to go to one.
Anonymous wrote:OP - here's a report that may be helpful.
States dramatically cut spending in the wake of the recession a decade ago, and while it is on the upswing it hasn't returned to those levels.
https://www.cbpp.org/research/state-budget-and-tax/a-lost-decade-in-higher-education-funding
Anonymous wrote:Don't worry. The subsidization of richer university students and their professors by lower income (on average) taxpayers continues unabated.