Anonymous wrote:Well you'd never buy a car until you test drove it, would you?
Anonymous wrote:I think it's risky because I've seen it lead to a lot of relationships that lasted well past their expiration date. Living with someone creates a ton of inertia, because breaking up isn't just an emotional drain, it's a logistical pain. You can't just stop seeing someone--you have to find a new place and pack up your stuff and move out. You might both be on a lease. You have to divide up your stuff. You have a pet together. Your whole daily routine will change. So people stay together when they should break up--I've even seen people get married out of inertia when literally everyone else knew it was a terrible idea, because it was just easier than breaking up.
I also think you both really need to be on the same page about the future. If one of you thinks that moving in together means you're on the road to marriage and the other doesn't, there are problems. A relationship can stagnate, and the one who's happy with things the way they are has no reason to change, and the one who isn't has a lot more to lose.
Moving in together to save money on rent or something is a bad idea.
FWIW, I lived with my now-husband for just under six months before we got engaged. We had talked about and were on the same page wrt how serious the relationship was and how we felt about marriage.
Anonymous wrote:I think it's important to live together before marriage to gauge real compatibility.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just curious as it came up in conversation the other day. My rather liberal mother is staunch on one rule in life - never live with someone until you are married. Her reasonings are that classic "Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?" idiom and that it just makes things 10x more difficult if things go south.
I understand those points of views but think it's a good idea to live with each other before marriage because understanding whether you can live well together is a BIG part of having a successful marriage. I would perhaps open up her rule to "never live with someone until you're engaged (or soon to be engaged)." Or I would say that living together (in a rental situation) before marriage is fine, but you shouldn't buy property together yet.
What are your opinions?
But the milk in that saying is sex, not constant residential closeness, and most couples who have to decide whether to live together or not before marriage are having sex either way. I think it's a good way to see how much of their weight a person pulls in a household, if nothing else. Plus I live in a HCOL area and my finances got a jolt when my moved in with my then-boyfriend (now DH), as did his.
Anonymous wrote:Just curious as it came up in conversation the other day. My rather liberal mother is staunch on one rule in life - never live with someone until you are married. Her reasonings are that classic "Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?" idiom and that it just makes things 10x more difficult if things go south.
I understand those points of views but think it's a good idea to live with each other before marriage because understanding whether you can live well together is a BIG part of having a successful marriage. I would perhaps open up her rule to "never live with someone until you're engaged (or soon to be engaged)." Or I would say that living together (in a rental situation) before marriage is fine, but you shouldn't buy property together yet.
What are your opinions?