Anonymous wrote:I posted this question in another forum but it got blown out of portion so I'll ask here.
I'm the executor of my fathers estate but I still have a 55 year old brother that lives at my parents home. This sibling is financially secure and can easily afford to buy a new home on his own, just not this one because of cost. I also have 4 siblings that live on there own, some of which that can use this inheritance money to improve the quality of there life plus kids college costs. I have no real money issues so I'm in no hurry to sell this house. BUT, I know at some point my siblings will want this brother to move out so we can sell the house and move on.
My question is, how much time is fair to give him to find a new place to live? A month, 6 months, 12 months, as long as he needs? And before you start in on me, no one is being money hungry, I'm just trying to be fair with everyone and attempting to keep peace in the family.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, It's all about legal. It's not about anyone being "money hungry", it's about doing things legally. You as executor must do the right thing legally. Your siblings should be insisting - legally - that brother move from the house so is can be sold (could be to him). The estate needs to be settled and closed. If you don't understand that, I as a sibling, would act to have you legally removed as executor.
Yes. The other siblings have not insisted that the brother be removed, so why the hurry? Your brother, you and all your siblings need to have a meeting with calm heads first and come to a resolution. For all you know, your other siblings are grateful that the brother was living with parents and they were not alone.
Anonymous wrote:I haven't seen the postings on the previous thread, so I hope I'm not repeating what others have said.
Your brother lived with your elderly parents? I'm sure it was extremely beneficial for your parents, at the same time that your brother was probably content to stay with mom and dad. However, if your parents had had to enter an assisted living facility, they would have been paying something in the ballpark of $7,000-$10,000 a month, per individual, to the tune of a minimum of $84,000 per year, per parent. He also gave them the gift of staying at home in their old age. Don't know what their health situation was, but it's wretched having to enter a facility due to health issues. It's wretched having to live in one of those facilities, period. He surely provided quite a bit of care to your parents, and comfort, and the ability to stay in their own home and to sleep in their own bed. That's BIG.
Therefore, be merciful with him. Be as merciful as you can be. Don't throw him out in a month, or in three months. I think one year is reasonable.
Maybe even give him the opportunity to buy the house from the estate. Maybe even cut him a break on what the market value is on the house. Remember, he saved something in the ballpark of $84,000/per year, per parent, for your parents. So maybe you can take that into consideration when you set the price you would like to sell the house for. If you calculate what his share is of the estate, and add to that some of the funds that would have gone to pay for a nursing home or in-home care, do you think it might be possible for your brother to buy the house? Does he even want to stay in the house?
That's my take on your situation, but I don't know all the details.
Anonymous wrote:OP, It's all about legal. It's not about anyone being "money hungry", it's about doing things legally. You as executor must do the right thing legally. Your siblings should be insisting - legally - that brother move from the house so is can be sold (could be to him). The estate needs to be settled and closed. If you don't understand that, I as a sibling, would act to have you legally removed as executor.