Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They're actually getting rid of underperformers, and in 2017 they had a net growth in hiring.
So naive are the educated elite until it happens to them
Rank and yank
This is always the case in any large company. You must protect yourself - no one else will.
Average tenure is 2 years
What a great company to work for
It is if you're upper management. You burn and churn, extracting maximum productivity and utility from your employees. That's the Amazon culture and explains why it has been so successful - starting almost 20 years ago from a simple online bookstore in 1999. Don't be so surprised - many so-called great companies started this way too. Look at Microsoft, Oracle, IBM, etc.... They all grew very quickly and success as an employee was based on merit/productivity. Average and under performers were not retained. If you're looking to pull a 9-5 shift and go home, Amazon and other companies like it aren't for you.
Don't hate the player, hate the game.
The game where you work your life away to line someone else’s pockets? A sucker is truly born every minute.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They're actually getting rid of underperformers, and in 2017 they had a net growth in hiring.
So naive are the educated elite until it happens to them
Rank and yank
This is always the case in any large company. You must protect yourself - no one else will.
Average tenure is 2 years
What a great company to work for
It is if you're upper management. You burn and churn, extracting maximum productivity and utility from your employees. That's the Amazon culture and explains why it has been so successful - starting almost 20 years ago from a simple online bookstore in 1999. Don't be so surprised - many so-called great companies started this way too. Look at Microsoft, Oracle, IBM, etc.... They all grew very quickly and success as an employee was based on merit/productivity. Average and under performers were not retained. If you're looking to pull a 9-5 shift and go home, Amazon and other companies like it aren't for you.
Don't hate the player, hate the game.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They're actually getting rid of underperformers, and in 2017 they had a net growth in hiring.
So naive are the educated elite until it happens to them
Rank and yank
This is always the case in any large company. You must protect yourself - no one else will.
Average tenure is 2 years
What a great company to work for
It is if you're upper management. You burn and churn, extracting maximum productivity and utility from your employees. That's the Amazon culture and explains why it has been so successful - starting almost 20 years ago from a simple online bookstore in 1999. Don't be so surprised - many so-called great companies started this way too. Look at Microsoft, Oracle, IBM, etc.... They all grew very quickly and success as an employee was based on merit/productivity. Average and under performers were not retained. If you're looking to pull a 9-5 shift and go home, Amazon and other companies like it aren't for you.
Don't hate the player, hate the game.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They're actually getting rid of underperformers, and in 2017 they had a net growth in hiring.
So naive are the educated elite until it happens to them
Rank and yank
This is always the case in any large company. You must protect yourself - no one else will.
Average tenure is 2 years
What a great company to work for
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They're actually getting rid of underperformers, and in 2017 they had a net growth in hiring.
So naive are the educated elite until it happens to them
Rank and yank
This is always the case in any large company. You must protect yourself - no one else will.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They're actually getting rid of underperformers, and in 2017 they had a net growth in hiring.
So naive are the educated elite until it happens to them
Rank and yank
Anonymous wrote:They're actually getting rid of underperformers, and in 2017 they had a net growth in hiring.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are more restructuring and if you read the article those will get offered jobs in other areas. Not everything is with HQ2. They were clear, if you read it, that it was with the sales.
Downsizing restructuring layoffs. Whatever. They are stilling trying to hire thousands of guest workers to replace US citizens. This is the new normal
Anonymous wrote:They are more restructuring and if you read the article those will get offered jobs in other areas. Not everything is with HQ2. They were clear, if you read it, that it was with the sales.