Anonymous wrote:FCPS is about to move the wealthiest neighborhoods zoned for Luther Jackson MS to Thoreau MS.
What will this do:
* increase ESOL/FARMS rates at Jackson
* give Thoreau LLIV students at option to stay at Thoreau or take a bus to the AAP center at Jackson
* turn Thoreau into a three-way split feeder
Why do this: because Jackson is overcrowded and Thoreau has capcity, and the parents getting move to the wealthier school won't complain
Why not do this: because it will further concentrate poverty in the Gen Ed population remaining at Jackson, turn Thoreau into a three-way split feeder to Madison, Marshall and Oakton, and fail to address the fact that Poe MS, which also shares a border with Jackson, has MORE EXCESS CAPACITY THAN THOREAU.
Once again, the FCPS School talks out of both sides of its mouth. They adopt lofty resolutions like One Fairfax to proclaim their commitment to equity, and then through their policy choices concentrate poverty in certain schools, create incentives for parents of kids who are not in AAP to avoid certain school pyramids like Falls Church and Annandale, and take the path of least resistance that caters to wealthier families and gives AAP students options that are not available to Gen Ed students.
Just watch Palchik, Hynes, Evans, Moon, Strauss, McElveen, and Keys-Gamarra go along with this. The hypocrisy is glaring.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Serious question: what do you want them to do instead?
I am in one of the neighborhoods that may move to Thoreau. I am fine with Jackson. Thoreau and Jackson are both far from my house. But Poe is farther and it makes no sense for my kid to go all the way to Poe. So do you want them to move the poorer kids to Poe? That doesn't seem to solve anything either. You are stuck with the fact that location and income are tied.
The neighborhoods closer to Poe (not yours) are wealthier than the rest of Poe. Moving them to Poe, which has more extra space than Thoreau, is a win-win.
You mean inside the Beltway? I guess. They are closer to Jackson than I am, I can see why we would be the logical choice just on location.
It's odd that middle schools are so concentrated around the Beltway, so that much of Vienna and Oakton is not near a middle school.
They are close to Poe and Poe is more under-capacity than Thoreau.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Serious question: what do you want them to do instead?
I am in one of the neighborhoods that may move to Thoreau. I am fine with Jackson. Thoreau and Jackson are both far from my house. But Poe is farther and it makes no sense for my kid to go all the way to Poe. So do you want them to move the poorer kids to Poe? That doesn't seem to solve anything either. You are stuck with the fact that location and income are tied.
The neighborhoods closer to Poe (not yours) are wealthier than the rest of Poe. Moving them to Poe, which has more extra space than Thoreau, is a win-win.
You mean inside the Beltway? I guess. They are closer to Jackson than I am, I can see why we would be the logical choice just on location.
It's odd that middle schools are so concentrated around the Beltway, so that much of Vienna and Oakton is not near a middle school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Serious question: what do you want them to do instead?
I am in one of the neighborhoods that may move to Thoreau. I am fine with Jackson. Thoreau and Jackson are both far from my house. But Poe is farther and it makes no sense for my kid to go all the way to Poe. So do you want them to move the poorer kids to Poe? That doesn't seem to solve anything either. You are stuck with the fact that location and income are tied.
The neighborhoods closer to Poe (not yours) are wealthier than the rest of Poe. Moving them to Poe, which has more extra space than Thoreau, is a win-win.
Anonymous wrote:Gentle reminder on the poors :
The poors have “poor” habits that make them detrimental to the schools - indolence, criminality, violence, lack of intellectual curiosity. Even the poors themselves do not want to live near the poors. This has been going on since the beginning of time and will never end for obvious reasons.
Anonymous wrote:Don't the non poors that feed Jackson go to Vienna anyways
Anonymous wrote:Serious question: what do you want them to do instead?
I am in one of the neighborhoods that may move to Thoreau. I am fine with Jackson. Thoreau and Jackson are both far from my house. But Poe is farther and it makes no sense for my kid to go all the way to Poe. So do you want them to move the poorer kids to Poe? That doesn't seem to solve anything either. You are stuck with the fact that location and income are tied.