Anonymous wrote:It's the same test. Lots and lots of kids did worse this time around. We're a pilot school for the math lessons and they are SO sick of iReady. It's the same test as fall and it's really long (60-90 mins average) and the kids just blow it off, so it's not an accurate assessment. Franky it's a HUGE waste of instructional time and if I was a parent I'd be raising hell about how much time is wasted.
Anonymous wrote:It's a long and boring test and my son has a history of rushing to play the game. They notice it the first time, so for the second assessment they slow him down and his scores shoot up. Then by the 3rd assessment they don't keep an eye on him and next thing they know he is playing the game and his scores dropped like the stock market.
How were the scores initially? Often if they are on or above level you don't see much growth and scores can evewn drop because the school focuses on bringing the low ones up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s a totally stupid assessment. Please do not put any stock in it. I swear it’s a scam. The scores are depressed so that everyone freaks out and then buys the even more stupid online “interventions.” Because that’s what kids need to be doing...spending more time on some stupid computer interventions.
We don't have the online interventions.
The students took i-Ready in the fall. They took it again this winter. That's about it. End of story.
Anonymous wrote:It’s a totally stupid assessment. Please do not put any stock in it. I swear it’s a scam. The scores are depressed so that everyone freaks out and then buys the even more stupid online “interventions.” Because that’s what kids need to be doing...spending more time on some stupid computer interventions.