Anonymous wrote:I think he has a limited range. However, I've also noticed that most of the questions that come in for the Q&A pretty much seem to be the same question asked 15 different ways. It could be that there is just a really small market for his schtick and he does what he does to keep that market open. I appreciate some of his comments although I admit I frequently don't agree with him because I think his reviews are so particular to his own tastes and preferences.
Anonymous wrote:I never understood why he relentlessly promotes Rasika every chance he gets. It's a good restaurant but not all that great.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tom lost all credibility as a food critic when he name a mediocre pizza restaurant a top-10 restaurant in DC.
which one?
Timber Pizza in Petworth
No, it was All Purpose. Timber barely qualifies as pizza.
It was All Purpose.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tom lost all credibility as a food critic when he name a mediocre pizza restaurant a top-10 restaurant in DC.
which one?
Timber Pizza in Petworth
No, it was All Purpose. Timber barely qualifies as pizza.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tom lost all credibility as a food critic when he name a mediocre pizza restaurant a top-10 restaurant in DC.
which one?
Timber Pizza in Petworth
No, it was All Purpose. Timber barely qualifies as pizza.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tom lost all credibility as a food critic when he name a mediocre pizza restaurant a top-10 restaurant in DC.
which one?
Timber Pizza in Petworth
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tom lost all credibility as a food critic when he name a mediocre pizza restaurant a top-10 restaurant in DC.
which one?
Anonymous wrote:Tom lost all credibility as a food critic when he name a mediocre pizza restaurant a top-10 restaurant in DC.