Anonymous wrote:1) They have no prior criminal convictions
2) They are either pursuing education or has a job and not relying on public assistance
3) Chain immigration is ended for everyone except those bringing over minor dependents.
What about you? Do you support giving permanent status and under what conditions?
Anonymous wrote:I support
1) They have no criminal charges
2) They are either pursuing education or has a job and not relying on public assistance
3) They have 18 months to prove this or they are gone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1) They have no prior criminal convictions
2) They are either pursuing education or has a job and not relying on public assistance
3) Chain immigration is ended for everyone except those bringing over minor dependents.
What about you? Do you support giving permanent status and under what conditions?
That is all already built in. Glad you're on board
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1) They have no prior criminal convictions
2) They are either pursuing education or has a job and not relying on public assistance
3) Chain immigration is ended for everyone except those bringing over minor dependents.
What about you? Do you support giving permanent status and under what conditions?
That is all already built in. Glad you're on board
OP here...I believe 1 and 2 are but not 3.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1) They have no prior criminal convictions
2) They are either pursuing education or has a job and not relying on public assistance
3) Chain immigration is ended for everyone except those bringing over minor dependents.
What about you? Do you support giving permanent status and under what conditions?
That is all already built in. Glad you're on board
Anonymous wrote:1) They have no prior criminal convictions
2) They are either pursuing education or has a job and not relying on public assistance
3) Chain immigration is ended for everyone except those bringing over minor dependents.
What about you? Do you support giving permanent status and under what conditions?