Anonymous wrote:My son made it into pool for CogAt only. But two of three scores (verbal and quantitative) were almost perfect with a composite of 142. He’d better get in!
Anonymous wrote:NNAT 119
Coat 136 composite (nonverbal was perfect, but reading was around 120)
GBRS = 12
AART told me non-verbal is not a predictor of academic success. Got in on appeal with WISC GAI somewhere around 130 or 132.
Anonymous wrote:NNAT 119
Coat 136 composite (nonverbal was perfect, but reading was around 120)
GBRS = 12
AART told me non-verbal is not a predictor of academic success. Got in on appeal with WISC GAI somewhere around 130 or 132.
Anonymous wrote:Usually, the in-pool rejections are due to low GBRS or in-pool NNAT with low CogAT. Keep in mind that the local committee knows that your kid is in pool, so when they give a GBRS < 10 they're basically telling the central committee that the child does not belong in AAP. High scores + very low GBRS means that the child is showing nothing in class that corroborates the high scores, and is probably viewed as a red flag for prepping.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone from previous years who had child in pool but not accepted to level IV; if so, what were NNAT and CogAt scores and GBRS, if you know? Thanks for sharing
if your DC had above cut-off NNAT, Cogat scores and decent GBRS > 12, then admission would have been guaranteed. Was it the case?
Most kids who are rejected (reading this forum) are based on low GBRS and/or made it to pool only on NNAT/Cogat score. Also low sub-scores (verbal <120) seems to play important role here for rejection.
Anonymous wrote:Anyone from previous years who had child in pool but not accepted to level IV; if so, what were NNAT and CogAt scores and GBRS, if you know? Thanks for sharing