Anonymous wrote:My MIL gave me an “extra” gift this year as well. It was clearly used lotion (was crusty at opening and missing some) and a mix of “not for resale” toiletry samples. Also clearly stated it was a Christmas gift.
I accepted graciously and will use the stuff (ok, maybe not the questionable lotion), but I couldn’t help but laugh. At least make sure the stuff isn’t blatantly used. That’s just odd. And no, money isn’t the issue.
Anonymous wrote:My MIL gave me an “extra” gift this year as well. It was clearly used lotion (was crusty at opening and missing some) and a mix of “not for resale” toiletry samples. Also clearly stated it was a Christmas gift.
I accepted graciously and will use the stuff (ok, maybe not the questionable lotion), but I couldn’t help but laugh. At least make sure the stuff isn’t blatantly used. That’s just odd. And no, money isn’t the issue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So she gave you a shawl she found among her things that she thought you might like. She didn’t try to pass it off as a special gift, based on its presentation in a plain bag. Just because it’s not new doesn’t mean it’s not a gift. What am I missing? What’s the problem here?
Oh come on! She said it was Xmas gift, didn't give OP a gift at Christmas, and has a history of giving OP gifts that make it clear she thinks of her as an afterthought if at all. OP isn't saying that it's a deliberate nasty-gram; she's saying her MIL clearly telegraphs her lack of enthusiasm for her through these gifts, and it's unnecessary and hurts her feelings.
This is pretty much it. One year she gave DH a Costco pack of Sensodyne (toothpaste for sensitive gums), but it had two tubes missing and then taped shut with masking tape. She told him it was his Xmas gift. So I guess I shouldn't take it personally.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So she gave you a shawl she found among her things that she thought you might like. She didn’t try to pass it off as a special gift, based on its presentation in a plain bag. Just because it’s not new doesn’t mean it’s not a gift. What am I missing? What’s the problem here?
Oh come on! She said it was Xmas gift, didn't give OP a gift at Christmas, and has a history of giving OP gifts that make it clear she thinks of her as an afterthought if at all. OP isn't saying that it's a deliberate nasty-gram; she's saying her MIL clearly telegraphs her lack of enthusiasm for her through these gifts, and it's unnecessary and hurts her feelings.
Anonymous wrote:So she gave you a shawl she found among her things that she thought you might like. She didn’t try to pass it off as a special gift, based on its presentation in a plain bag. Just because it’s not new doesn’t mean it’s not a gift. What am I missing? What’s the problem here?
Anonymous wrote:So she gave you a shawl she found among her things that she thought you might like. She didn’t try to pass it off as a special gift, based on its presentation in a plain bag. Just because it’s not new doesn’t mean it’s not a gift. What am I missing? What’s the problem here?
Anonymous wrote:So she gave you a shawl she found among her things that she thought you might like. She didn’t try to pass it off as a special gift, based on its presentation in a plain bag. Just because it’s not new doesn’t mean it’s not a gift. What am I missing? What’s the problem here?
Anonymous wrote:You said thank you?