Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the timetable for this and is it a done deal? Will they keep the DC United Academy teams in Washington DC and now have two teams each age group under their moniker (a DC and a VA DC United)? I’m confused over the rationale with DCU being at the bottom of the standings in MLS.
It sounds like a grab at more revenue.
The whole DA, pre-DA thing in this area is crap.
DC United needs new training facility, that is what this is about. Everyone would train at the new facility to include the first team, USL team, and academy teams. It would be in both their interest to merge if this deal goes through.
So Loudoun becomes the training facility and the games are played in the new stadium in DC?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the timetable for this and is it a done deal? Will they keep the DC United Academy teams in Washington DC and now have two teams each age group under their moniker (a DC and a VA DC United)? I’m confused over the rationale with DCU being at the bottom of the standings in MLS.
It sounds like a grab at more revenue.
The whole DA, pre-DA thing in this area is crap.
DC United needs new training facility, that is what this is about. Everyone would train at the new facility to include the first team, USL team, and academy teams. It would be in both their interest to merge if this deal goes through.
Anonymous wrote:What is the timetable for this and is it a done deal? Will they keep the DC United Academy teams in Washington DC and now have two teams each age group under their moniker (a DC and a VA DC United)? I’m confused over the rationale with DCU being at the bottom of the standings in MLS.
It sounds like a grab at more revenue.
The whole DA, pre-DA thing in this area is crap.
Anonymous wrote:What is the timetable for this and is it a done deal? Will they keep the DC United Academy teams in Washington DC and now have two teams each age group under their moniker (a DC and a VA DC United)? I’m confused over the rationale with DCU being at the bottom of the standings in MLS.
It sounds like a grab at more revenue.
The whole DA, pre-DA thing in this area is crap.
Anonymous wrote:To comment on the rest of your post OP, I think the non-DA related outcomes from DC United coming to Loudoun will be entirely positive. Think of a USL stadium being filled with youth players and other bystanders wanting a different activity than their suburban lifestyle, exiled by the 265 tolled highway, currently provides. Certainly no merge is happening, there is an active rec and other soccer related activities Loudoun puts on that have nothing to with their DA program, not to mention their successful travel program.
Anonymous wrote:Will DC United still have just one DA team per age group? If so, it will obviously make Loudoun's DA teams (currently U12, U13, and U14 boys) less competitive, but shouldn't have much of an impact on their massive youth program overall. The max number of kids on a DA team is 20-something, so we are not talking about huge numbers, and many of the kids who play for DC United will come from other areas of NoVa.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Will DC United still have just one DA team per age group? If so, it will obviously make Loudoun's DA teams (currently U12, U13, and U14 boys) less competitive, but shouldn't have much of an impact on their massive youth program overall. The max number of kids on a DA team is 20-something, so we are not talking about huge numbers, and many of the kids who play for DC United will come from other areas of NoVa.
It pretty much renders Loudoun's DA as almost pointless. That is not insignificant. That obviously is not the same as rendering Loudoun Soccer as pointless but for the effort of running a DA Loudoun Soccer will have to seriously reconsider whether it sticks with it or not.
I'm not sure that's necessarily true. Bethesda and Baltimore Armour have teams that are more successful than DC United in some age groups many years, and the three programs are (theoretically) driving distance from each other. There are many kids who switch from one program to the other (some have played for all 3) due to team dynamics, style of play issues, or in search of a coach that they feel values them properly. I'd imagine it would be the same with Loudoun and DC United after the move, and again, it's not like all the kids who play for DC United will come from Loudoun county.
Also, clubs love to have a DA program for marketing purposes, and there are a lot of benefits to playing DA even if you are on a less strong team, including better competition and more frequent training. I'd be surprised if Loudoun opted to withdraw.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Will DC United still have just one DA team per age group? If so, it will obviously make Loudoun's DA teams (currently U12, U13, and U14 boys) less competitive, but shouldn't have much of an impact on their massive youth program overall. The max number of kids on a DA team is 20-something, so we are not talking about huge numbers, and many of the kids who play for DC United will come from other areas of NoVa.
It pretty much renders Loudoun's DA as almost pointless. That is not insignificant. That obviously is not the same as rendering Loudoun Soccer as pointless but for the effort of running a DA Loudoun Soccer will have to seriously reconsider whether it sticks with it or not.
Anonymous wrote:Will DC United still have just one DA team per age group? If so, it will obviously make Loudoun's DA teams (currently U12, U13, and U14 boys) less competitive, but shouldn't have much of an impact on their massive youth program overall. The max number of kids on a DA team is 20-something, so we are not talking about huge numbers, and many of the kids who play for DC United will come from other areas of NoVa.
Anonymous wrote:With DCU’s plan to build more fields and a stadium for training and a USL team at Bolen Park, what do you think the effect will be on Loudoun Soccer? All good, or will there be negative impact on the club itself?