Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends entirely on the schools
We can’t comment without knowing the schools in question
Nope. Looking for more holistic answers and want to avoid crazy slamming of one opportunity v another.
There are some questions whose answers just are not useful. It really depends on which two schools. The general answer to this question really is not of benefit to anyone.
I guess the only general answer that I can give that might be of use to any real person trying to make this decision is this: if you are very religious, you will find more opportunities to integrate your education and faith at a private school. Most private schools were founded a long time ago partly to train clergy and to provide a congenial environment for the faithful, and some of that is still left over in some of them. It is also true that, if they are the same price, you are probably getting a big scholarship at the private. Other people are paying to provide smaller class sizes for your student.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends entirely on the schools
We can’t comment without knowing the schools in question
Nope. Looking for more holistic answers and want to avoid crazy slamming of one opportunity v another.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My friends at private schools tended to have a smaller, more personal experience. I wanted to go somewhere that had lots of choice and lots of people, so I went to a big public.
I endured 600 person lectures, but I think that was ok for me. I had no idea what I wanted to be when I was 17, so it was best to have lots of decent quality options for courses of study.
That perspective has always confused me. In the long run, would having access to 2000 courses at Yale for undergrad vs. 4000 at UCLA make a major difference? Even small LACs offer 500-1000 courses annually, which rotate around each year. One only takes 30-50 courses to graduate, depending on the school. Isn't there a threshold where each additional class offered means less and less?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My friends at private schools tended to have a smaller, more personal experience. I wanted to go somewhere that had lots of choice and lots of people, so I went to a big public.
I endured 600 person lectures, but I think that was ok for me. I had no idea what I wanted to be when I was 17, so it was best to have lots of decent quality options for courses of study.
That perspective has always confused me. In the long run, would having access to 2000 courses at Yale for undergrad vs. 4000 at UCLA make a major difference? Even small LACs offer 500-1000 courses annually, which rotate around each year. One only takes 30-50 courses to graduate, depending on the school. Isn't there a threshold where each additional class offered means less and less?
Anonymous wrote:My friends at private schools tended to have a smaller, more personal experience. I wanted to go somewhere that had lots of choice and lots of people, so I went to a big public.
I endured 600 person lectures, but I think that was ok for me. I had no idea what I wanted to be when I was 17, so it was best to have lots of decent quality options for courses of study.
Anonymous wrote:Depends entirely on the schools
We can’t comment without knowing the schools in question