Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“I have a rough time wanting to spend billions and billions and trillions of dollars to help people who won’t help themselves – won’t lift a finger – and expect the federal government to do everything.”
Thank you for finally saying it, Senator Hatch.It's become an epidemic of laziness at this point.
Ok if the poor are as lazy as you say - what's your solution? Let them rot and starve? Let them endure horrid working conditions?
What were their lives like before the new deal?
So much disdain for those you deem unworthy- when the reality is you'd rather have them scraping by the skin of their teeth than pay taxes for a social safety net.
Anonymous wrote:“I have a rough time wanting to spend billions and billions and trillions of dollars to help people who won’t help themselves – won’t lift a finger – and expect the federal government to do everything.”
Thank you for finally saying it, Senator Hatch.It's become an epidemic of laziness at this point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But he's good with the tax plan benefiting the rich passive investor (as opposed to the rich working person).
Apparently the quote during debate was:
“[L]et me tell you something: we’re going to do CHIP. There’s no question about it in my mind. It’s got to be done the right way. But we, the reason CHIP’s having trouble is because we don’t have money anymore.”
Hatch went on to condemn the idea of “more and more spending.” After praising the “terrific job” CHIP has done for families who need help, he immediately added, “I have a rough time wanting to spend billions and billions and trillions of dollars to help people who won’t help themselves – won’t lift a finger – and expect the federal government to do everything.”
Why don't we propose legislation to put all those CHIP kids to work in coal mines? And we could have a special provision for the coal mine owners that they pay no tax at all!
Why would anyone disagree with what is shown in bold?
Anonymous wrote:But he's good with the tax plan benefiting the rich passive investor (as opposed to the rich working person).
Apparently the quote during debate was:
“[L]et me tell you something: we’re going to do CHIP. There’s no question about it in my mind. It’s got to be done the right way. But we, the reason CHIP’s having trouble is because we don’t have money anymore.”
Hatch went on to condemn the idea of “more and more spending.” After praising the “terrific job” CHIP has done for families who need help, he immediately added, “I have a rough time wanting to spend billions and billions and trillions of dollars to help people who won’t help themselves – won’t lift a finger – and expect the federal government to do everything.”
Why don't we propose legislation to put all those CHIP kids to work in coal mines? And we could have a special provision for the coal mine owners that they pay no tax at all!
Anonymous wrote:PP - but good luck taking the tax breaks away from the rich who can afford mega campaign contributions. This bill really is a way to get the Treasury to refund campaign contributions made to the Republicans...
Anonymous wrote:This is just the beginning. After blowing a hole in then deficit, the GOP is coming for ALL social safety net programs by saying we can’t afford them anymore. Essentially the tax cut will be paid for by those most in need.
Anonymous wrote:This is just the beginning. After blowing a hole in then deficit, the GOP is coming for ALL social safety net programs by saying we can’t afford them anymore. Essentially the tax cut will be paid for by those most in need.