Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Disclaimer: I'm a guy who has been married for 20 years. I don't think I've flirted with anyone but my wife since then. (I was never that good at flirting.)
Some of the male response to the recent wave of harassment news has been to complain that innocent attempts to flirt or strike up a romance will get them fired for harassment. Is the line really that ambiguous?
Step one would seem to be just not to pursue romance at work. But, I guess for some that might be unrealistic - work might be the only place they interact with other people. Step two, if you are going to pursue romance at work, don't pursue a subordinate. Step three, be polite and take no for an answer.
Am I oversimplifying?
Rule #1 - don't sh*t where you eat (i.e., no romance of any sort at work)
Rule #2 - don't be a f*cking asshole towards women.
~ another mid-40s guy here
Problem with rule 2 is, you don't get to define what "being an asshole" is. She may decide you're an asshole... many years after the fact.
Anonymous wrote:A smart man will not engage in any sort of flirting ( a normal way men and women had interacted for centuries) or romance (mutually agreed upon sexual relationship) at all in today's America, especially not in a workplace. It's not worth risking one's reputation, employment, and life. There are plenty of options for American males outside of the urban, leftist American female.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How about this rule: if you're interested in someone at work or elsewhere, first ask them out (as long as it's not someone you supervise because then the power dynamic is off). Don't start by trying to touch their body or make lewd comments to them. And if they say no to going out, then drop it and look elsewhere.
Seems fairly simple to me.
But the movies say I'm just supposed to know when she's interested and sweep her off her feet. If Han Solo had waited for Leia to say "yes," we would never have had Kylo Ren. O.k., bad example. But you get my point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Disclaimer: I'm a guy who has been married for 20 years. I don't think I've flirted with anyone but my wife since then. (I was never that good at flirting.)
Some of the male response to the recent wave of harassment news has been to complain that innocent attempts to flirt or strike up a romance will get them fired for harassment. Is the line really that ambiguous?
Step one would seem to be just not to pursue romance at work. But, I guess for some that might be unrealistic - work might be the only place they interact with other people. Step two, if you are going to pursue romance at work, don't pursue a subordinate. Step three, be polite and take no for an answer.
Am I oversimplifying?
Rule #1 - don't sh*t where you eat (i.e., no romance of any sort at work)
Rule #2 - don't be a f*cking asshole towards women.
~ another mid-40s guy here
Anonymous wrote:How about this rule: if you're interested in someone at work or elsewhere, first ask them out (as long as it's not someone you supervise because then the power dynamic is off). Don't start by trying to touch their body or make lewd comments to them. And if they say no to going out, then drop it and look elsewhere.
Seems fairly simple to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of course it's not difficult. Apparently you also should add that courtship does not involve dropping your pants out of the blue.
Or inviting someone to your office and then locking the door with a secret button on/under your desk.
Anonymous wrote:No. It is that easy to behave appropriately in the workplace, and no one gets fired for mildly flirting once. Cast a strong side-eye at any guy who says that, because chances are they are up to more than "courting."
Anonymous wrote:Disclaimer: I'm a guy who has been married for 20 years. I don't think I've flirted with anyone but my wife since then. (I was never that good at flirting.)
Some of the male response to the recent wave of harassment news has been to complain that innocent attempts to flirt or strike up a romance will get them fired for harassment. Is the line really that ambiguous?
Step one would seem to be just not to pursue romance at work. But, I guess for some that might be unrealistic - work might be the only place they interact with other people. Step two, if you are going to pursue romance at work, don't pursue a subordinate. Step three, be polite and take no for an answer.
Am I oversimplifying?
Anonymous wrote:Of course it's not difficult. Apparently you also should add that courtship does not involve dropping your pants out of the blue.