Anonymous wrote:I'm not and I don't know a single man that is. I'm finished teaching women how to have orgasms. I'm? keeping my current lady for life

*snort* yeah, cool story bro.

Anonymous wrote:It's about not allocating resources into genes that are not yours. By bedding a virgin with a hymen, men was sure that potential offspring were theirs. This was before paternity test.
Today, about 5% of children are not offspring of their official fathers. If men were smart they would demand virginity or paternity tests. I am a woman and I am saying this.

That's so silly. Virginity is a one-time deal. A woman who was deflowered yesterday could just as easily have sex with another dude the next day. It's not like it grows anew every time.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the misogyny runs a little deeper than women seem to think. It's not just that the woman means little to the man & he's using her for his own pleasure. He's using her to score in his competition with other men. Social status depends not only on how many women he has sex with but also on the perceived difficulty of having sex with her.

This is true, but this can still be true even if the woman is not a virgin. Most men I know have an ideal of a lightly sexually experienced woman, 2-5 prior partners perhaps and no a non-slut reputation. But the classic freak in the sheets and lady in the streets can't really be achieved with a virgin, who has zero sexual experience.

Bunch of BS.

This isn't true of most men. But some will want the ego boost of being the first one and "breaking new ground."

My poor high school BF did not enjoy taking mine....it was extremely painful and took multiple attempts.

It's misogyny. It's about possession, and "owning" the woman's virginity.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the misogyny runs a little deeper than women seem to think. It's not just that the woman means little to the man & he's using her for his own pleasure. He's using her to score in his competition with other men. Social status depends not only on how many women he has sex with but also on the perceived difficulty of having sex with her.

This is true, but this can still be true even if the woman is not a virgin. Most men I know have an ideal of a lightly sexually experienced woman, 2-5 prior partners perhaps and no a non-slut reputation. But the classic freak in the sheets and lady in the streets can't really be achieved with a virgin, who has zero sexual experience.

There's a huge double standard here, too. My millennial-aged, relatively "enlightened" BF has a problem with my number, which is only slightly higher than his, and includes women, as I'm bi. I don't get it. Here's a highly educated guy, sensitive, intellectual, generally thoughtful, and yet it's a real hang up for him.

Anonymous wrote:I think the misogyny runs a little deeper than women seem to think. It's not just that the woman means little to the man & he's using her for his own pleasure. He's using her to score in his competition with other men. Social status depends not only on how many women he has sex with but also on the perceived difficulty of having sex with her.

This is true, but this can still be true even if the woman is not a virgin. Most men I know have an ideal of a lightly sexually experienced woman, 2-5 prior partners perhaps and no a non-slut reputation. But the classic freak in the sheets and lady in the streets can't really be achieved with a virgin, who has zero sexual experience.

I think the misogyny runs a little deeper than women seem to think. It's not just that the woman means little to the man & he's using her for his own pleasure. He's using her to score in his competition with other men. Social status depends not only on how many women he has sex with but also on the perceived difficulty of having sex with her.

I'm not. And until recently, I assumed that most modern men did not care. But I've become aware of "Red Pill" like forums where men seem obsessed with their (non-existent) girlfriends' "not being a slut."

I think it's mostly rooted in jealousy and assumptions about how women seemly get to go through life being sexually desired and pursued while most dudes have to work at it and deal with rejection and feeling like losers. In some cases, a man is from a culture where "virginity" is an issue, but I doubt that's the case at "Red Pill."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:1st on the moon
1st on Everest
1st to have an atomic bomb
etc....

yeah but these are all nearly impossible things to do.

that's why some people are willing to high price, right?

It's about not allocating resources into genes that are not yours. By bedding a virgin with a hymen, men was sure that potential offspring were theirs. This was before paternity test.
Today, about 5% of children are not offspring of their official fathers. If men were smart they would demand virginity or paternity tests. I am a woman and I am saying this.

I'm not and I don't know a single man that is. I'm finished teaching women how to have orgasms. I'm? keeping my current lady for life

Anonymous wrote:1st on the moon
1st on Everest
1st to have an atomic bomb
etc....

yeah but these are all nearly impossible things to do.

1st on the moon
1st on Everest
1st to have an atomic bomb
etc....

I saw this link in another thread on this web site. This girl held an auction for her virginity and ultimately sold it for $3 MILLION dollars. That's a lot of dudes bidding the price up.

What gives? Why would you pay so much to have sex with someone who doesn't know what they're doing?


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5088459/Model-19-sells-virginity-2-MILLION.html