Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They also play many kids up in age which is smart developmentally. Some of the kids are 1-2 years younger than the teams they are scrimmaging. So there’s that.
It's not for everyone, some kids just shy away from contact from older/bigger players. It's usually the players that love the sport, or already play with older/bigger players like with their siblings, parents, local pickup, that can be placed in an older age group and still shine.
Anonymous wrote:I think the FCB boys looked lost, maybe it's the fact that they don't play in matches too often, but our boys didn't seem to play as a team. A few had good footskills, but not many of them displayed the soccer IQ one would expect. For those that were there, what are your thoughts?
Anonymous wrote:They also play many kids up in age which is smart developmentally. Some of the kids are 1-2 years younger than the teams they are scrimmaging. So there’s that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the FCB boys looked lost, maybe it's the fact that they don't play in matches too often, but our boys didn't seem to play as a team. A few had good footskills, but not many of them displayed the soccer IQ one would expect. For those that were there, what are your thoughts?
I've seen them working out at Evergreen alot, but am not familiar with the age groups that they have. What age group friendly did you watch last night?
FYI, each age group has many players per age group—80 in some. This just started two months ago with players that had never met before. There are many different levels at the escola. Kids are moved constantly. There are no set teams and winning is not the goal, not external competitions. They are working on specific set things.
It’s a very hard concept for travel people to understand/grasp—even the travel coaches. I mean, seriously? Even Pep laughed when people gave him crap about Man City after 2 months and look where they are now..nobody can catch them. Development isn’t an overnight thing.
Anonymous wrote:It's still the en vogue thing -- do nothing but footskills, then toss the kids into games and don't worry about the fact that they don't understand it at all.
I'm told it pays off in the long run. I think it's just because everyone else quits playing soccer, so the kids who were in Division 7 move up to Division 2 and the parents consider it "progress." But maybe someone will find the right balance somewhere.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the FCB boys looked lost, maybe it's the fact that they don't play in matches too often, but our boys didn't seem to play as a team. A few had good footskills, but not many of them displayed the soccer IQ one would expect. For those that were there, what are your thoughts?
What was the age group for the scrimmages?
Anonymous wrote:I think the FCB boys looked lost, maybe it's the fact that they don't play in matches too often, but our boys didn't seem to play as a team. A few had good footskills, but not many of them displayed the soccer IQ one would expect. For those that were there, what are your thoughts?
Anonymous wrote:It's still the en vogue thing -- do nothing but footskills, then toss the kids into games and don't worry about the fact that they don't understand it at all.
I'm told it pays off in the long run. I think it's just because everyone else quits playing soccer, so the kids who were in Division 7 move up to Division 2 and the parents consider it "progress." But maybe someone will find the right balance somewhere.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the FCB boys looked lost, maybe it's the fact that they don't play in matches too often, but our boys didn't seem to play as a team. A few had good footskills, but not many of them displayed the soccer IQ one would expect. For those that were there, what are your thoughts?
I've seen them working out at Evergreen alot, but am not familiar with the age groups that they have. What age group friendly did you watch last night?
Anonymous wrote:I think the FCB boys looked lost, maybe it's the fact that they don't play in matches too often, but our boys didn't seem to play as a team. A few had good footskills, but not many of them displayed the soccer IQ one would expect. For those that were there, what are your thoughts?
Anonymous wrote:I think the FCB boys looked lost, maybe it's the fact that they don't play in matches too often, but our boys didn't seem to play as a team. A few had good footskills, but not many of them displayed the soccer IQ one would expect. For those that were there, what are your thoughts?