Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No way to spin it. These numbers are awful for Arlington.
As an Arlington parent who is happy with our schools, I think this is a great thing if it discourages people from moving here and crowding up the schools even more (and then complaining about the overcrowding that they contributed to).
Anonymous wrote:I think this is going to make things worse. People will just look at their own group and conclude that things are just fine.
Anonymous wrote:No way to spin it. These numbers are awful for Arlington.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I like the concept of trying to highlight where schools are under-serving minority students, but from a review of a few local schools I'm concerned that there is an unintended (I hope) effect of punishing schools with greater racial and economic diversity more harshly for the same degree of discrepancy in performance as their less-diverse peer schools. I'm on my phone with no pen and paper around to crunch numbers, though, so I can't be sure my impression is correct.
Translation: GS used to be an excellent talking point to demonstrate my families superior choices. Now that our number sucks, it’s no longer credible.
Anonymous wrote:I like the concept of trying to highlight where schools are under-serving minority students, but from a review of a few local schools I'm concerned that there is an unintended (I hope) effect of punishing schools with greater racial and economic diversity more harshly for the same degree of discrepancy in performance as their less-diverse peer schools. I'm on my phone with no pen and paper around to crunch numbers, though, so I can't be sure my impression is correct.
Anonymous wrote:I like the concept of trying to highlight where schools are under-serving minority students, but from a review of a few local schools I'm concerned that there is an unintended (I hope) effect of punishing schools with greater racial and economic diversity more harshly for the same degree of discrepancy in performance as their less-diverse peer schools. I'm on my phone with no pen and paper around to crunch numbers, though, so I can't be sure my impression is correct.
Anonymous wrote:Some people never liked GS, but with the constant changes in methodology and ratings over the past three years they've lost any remaining credibility.