Earlier poster back again. I forgot to add that failure to relieve pain can leave you open, as a practitioner, to board inquiry, for patient abandonment or other complaints. If most people would take opioids after the surgery you had, I don't want to be explaining to peer review why I omitted giving some to youAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm in health care, and can tell you that. Back in the old days, I could give someone a prescription for ibuprofen and maybe tylenol#3, and know that if those meds didn't control pain, I could call in a different medication. The DEA etc decided a few years ago that oxycodone, vicodin, percocet etc could no longer be called in to pharmacies, but required a written rx. So if a patient calls me at 9 pm at night, in pain, my recourse now is to sent them to the ER or urgent care, where they incur extra costs. I'm not going in to the empty office at 9pm to give a patient a physical prescription; that's not safe for me. I may tell the patient to hold on to the prescription paper for the opioid until they figure if they need it or not. I also tell them that those prescriptions expire, which they do. So the DEA's effort to limit prescriptions actually leads me to write more opioids than I used to. SAD but trueAnonymous wrote:I don't know if that's the answer, but doctors really do need to limit their prescriptions.
I had minor surgery last week. No significant pain at the hospital (I was asked about a million times) They gave me prescription strength ibuprofin just in case, which made sense and for which I was grateful. They sent me home with two prescriptions - one for 24 of the prescription ibuprofin and one for TEN pills of oxycodone. Keep in mind that not only did I not request that, but that I specifically said I wasn't in pain and that the ibuprofin was doing a fine job of managing it.
I didn't end up taking any of the oxycodone and turned it in this weekend at the drug take back events (good timing). But why in the world did I get it at all? And why did I get 10 of them instead of just one or two? My doc had told me before surgery that I'd probably be able to go back to work the next day, so it's not like I had some kind of miraculous recovery.
The whole thing was really startling to me.![]()
I'm that poster. Thanks so much for responding and for giving that insight. It definitely makes sense from your point of view - an important demonstration that sometimes the most well intentioned policies actually backfire.
I'm not sure what the answer is. I really don't think it was appropriate for me to be given that many opioids (and I will mention it to my doctor at the follow up) but I definitely see the conundrum now and understand why it happened.
Anonymous wrote:I'm in health care, and can tell you that. Back in the old days, I could give someone a prescription for ibuprofen and maybe tylenol#3, and know that if those meds didn't control pain, I could call in a different medication. The DEA etc decided a few years ago that oxycodone, vicodin, percocet etc could no longer be called in to pharmacies, but required a written rx. So if a patient calls me at 9 pm at night, in pain, my recourse now is to sent them to the ER or urgent care, where they incur extra costs. I'm not going in to the empty office at 9pm to give a patient a physical prescription; that's not safe for me. I may tell the patient to hold on to the prescription paper for the opioid until they figure if they need it or not. I also tell them that those prescriptions expire, which they do. So the DEA's effort to limit prescriptions actually leads me to write more opioids than I used to. SAD but trueAnonymous wrote:I don't know if that's the answer, but doctors really do need to limit their prescriptions.
I had minor surgery last week. No significant pain at the hospital (I was asked about a million times) They gave me prescription strength ibuprofin just in case, which made sense and for which I was grateful. They sent me home with two prescriptions - one for 24 of the prescription ibuprofin and one for TEN pills of oxycodone. Keep in mind that not only did I not request that, but that I specifically said I wasn't in pain and that the ibuprofin was doing a fine job of managing it.
I didn't end up taking any of the oxycodone and turned it in this weekend at the drug take back events (good timing). But why in the world did I get it at all? And why did I get 10 of them instead of just one or two? My doc had told me before surgery that I'd probably be able to go back to work the next day, so it's not like I had some kind of miraculous recovery.
The whole thing was really startling to me.![]()
Anonymous wrote:#NoMorePain or #StopthePain.
Congressional Legislators with morality and strength of character need to introduce the #NoMorePain Bill immediately. The No More Pain Bill would mandate that opioids cannot be prescribed for more than a 10-day supply. After that, any re-prescribing of opioids to the same person within a two-year period, must be administered at the physician's office and under physician supervision on a daily basis.
A universal pharmaceutical records patient database can be established and maintained for opioids only, in order to check that one patient does not repeatedly obtain a single prescription via multiple doctors. And the obligation that a physician administer any subsequent prescriptions on a daily basis, takes away a physician's argument that they just did not know.
The medical profession has already accepted as standard practice the recent, professionally-recommended, and voluntary limits on the over-prescription of antibiotics in order to prevent patient overuse and the subsequent development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
The medical profession needs to similarly accept new, legally-imposed limits on the over-prescription of opioids to prevent patient overuse and the subsequent development of drug addictions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:#NoMorePain or #StopthePain.
Congressional Legislators with morality and strength of character need to introduce the #NoMorePain Bill immediately. The No More Pain Bill would mandate that opioids cannot be prescribed for more than a 10-day supply. After that, any re-prescribing of opioids to the same person within a two-year period, must be administered at the physician's office and under physician supervision on a daily basis.
A universal pharmaceutical records patient database can be established and maintained for opioids only, in order to check that one patient does not repeatedly obtain a single prescription via multiple doctors. And the obligation that a physician administer any subsequent prescriptions on a daily basis, takes away a physician's argument that they just did not know.
The medical profession has already accepted as standard practice the recent, professionally-recommended, and voluntary limits on the over-prescription of antibiotics in order to prevent patient overuse and the subsequent development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
The medical profession needs to similarly accept new, legally-imposed limits on the over-prescription of opioids to prevent patient overuse and the subsequent development of drug addictions.
On a daily basis? Uh no. As a former cancer patient I needed my powerful opioids for weeks until the cancer meds started winning. I could not function without the opioids and I am genuinely worried about this crackdown. Especially with a cancer is under control now, but will return, this idea really worries me.
Anonymous wrote:I'm in health care, and can tell you that. Back in the old days, I could give someone a prescription for ibuprofen and maybe tylenol#3, and know that if those meds didn't control pain, I could call in a different medication. The DEA etc decided a few years ago that oxycodone, vicodin, percocet etc could no longer be called in to pharmacies, but required a written rx. So if a patient calls me at 9 pm at night, in pain, my recourse now is to sent them to the ER or urgent care, where they incur extra costs. I'm not going in to the empty office at 9pm to give a patient a physical prescription; that's not safe for me. I may tell the patient to hold on to the prescription paper for the opioid until they figure if they need it or not. I also tell them that those prescriptions expire, which they do. So the DEA's effort to limit prescriptions actually leads me to write more opioids than I used to. SAD but trueAnonymous wrote:I don't know if that's the answer, but doctors really do need to limit their prescriptions.
I had minor surgery last week. No significant pain at the hospital (I was asked about a million times) They gave me prescription strength ibuprofin just in case, which made sense and for which I was grateful. They sent me home with two prescriptions - one for 24 of the prescription ibuprofin and one for TEN pills of oxycodone. Keep in mind that not only did I not request that, but that I specifically said I wasn't in pain and that the ibuprofin was doing a fine job of managing it.
I didn't end up taking any of the oxycodone and turned it in this weekend at the drug take back events (good timing). But why in the world did I get it at all? And why did I get 10 of them instead of just one or two? My doc had told me before surgery that I'd probably be able to go back to work the next day, so it's not like I had some kind of miraculous recovery.
The whole thing was really startling to me.![]()
Anonymous wrote:#NoMorePain or #StopthePain.
Congressional Legislators with morality and strength of character need to introduce the #NoMorePain Bill immediately. The No More Pain Bill would mandate that opioids cannot be prescribed for more than a 10-day supply. After that, any re-prescribing of opioids to the same person within a two-year period, must be administered at the physician's office and under physician supervision on a daily basis.
A universal pharmaceutical records patient database can be established and maintained for opioids only, in order to check that one patient does not repeatedly obtain a single prescription via multiple doctors. And the obligation that a physician administer any subsequent prescriptions on a daily basis, takes away a physician's argument that they just did not know.
The medical profession has already accepted as standard practice the recent, professionally-recommended, and voluntary limits on the over-prescription of antibiotics in order to prevent patient overuse and the subsequent development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
The medical profession needs to similarly accept new, legally-imposed limits on the over-prescription of opioids to prevent patient overuse and the subsequent development of drug addictions.
I'm in health care, and can tell you that. Back in the old days, I could give someone a prescription for ibuprofen and maybe tylenol#3, and know that if those meds didn't control pain, I could call in a different medication. The DEA etc decided a few years ago that oxycodone, vicodin, percocet etc could no longer be called in to pharmacies, but required a written rx. So if a patient calls me at 9 pm at night, in pain, my recourse now is to sent them to the ER or urgent care, where they incur extra costs. I'm not going in to the empty office at 9pm to give a patient a physical prescription; that's not safe for me. I may tell the patient to hold on to the prescription paper for the opioid until they figure if they need it or not. I also tell them that those prescriptions expire, which they do. So the DEA's effort to limit prescriptions actually leads me to write more opioids than I used to. SAD but trueAnonymous wrote:I don't know if that's the answer, but doctors really do need to limit their prescriptions.
I had minor surgery last week. No significant pain at the hospital (I was asked about a million times) They gave me prescription strength ibuprofin just in case, which made sense and for which I was grateful. They sent me home with two prescriptions - one for 24 of the prescription ibuprofin and one for TEN pills of oxycodone. Keep in mind that not only did I not request that, but that I specifically said I wasn't in pain and that the ibuprofin was doing a fine job of managing it.
I didn't end up taking any of the oxycodone and turned it in this weekend at the drug take back events (good timing). But why in the world did I get it at all? And why did I get 10 of them instead of just one or two? My doc had told me before surgery that I'd probably be able to go back to work the next day, so it's not like I had some kind of miraculous recovery.
The whole thing was really startling to me.
Anonymous wrote:#NoMorePain or #StopthePain.
Congressional Legislators with morality and strength of character need to introduce the #NoMorePain Bill immediately. The No More Pain Bill would mandate that opioids cannot be prescribed for more than a 10-day supply. After that, any re-prescribing of opioids to the same person within a two-year period, must be administered at the physician's office and under physician supervision on a daily basis.
A universal pharmaceutical records patient database can be established and maintained for opioids only, in order to check that one patient does not repeatedly obtain a single prescription via multiple doctors. And the obligation that a physician administer any subsequent prescriptions on a daily basis, takes away a physician's argument that they just did not know.
The medical profession has already accepted as standard practice the recent, professionally-recommended, and voluntary limits on the over-prescription of antibiotics in order to prevent patient overuse and the subsequent development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
The medical profession needs to similarly accept new, legally-imposed limits on the over-prescription of opioids to prevent patient overuse and the subsequent development of drug addictions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:#NoMorePain or #StopthePain.
Congressional Legislators with morality and strength of character need to introduce the #NoMorePain Bill immediately. The No More Pain Bill would mandate that opioids cannot be prescribed for more than a 10-day supply. After that, any re-prescribing of opioids to the same person within a two-year period, must be administered at the physician's office and under physician supervision on a daily basis.
A universal pharmaceutical records patient database can be established and maintained for opioids only, in order to check that one patient does not repeatedly obtain a single prescription via multiple doctors. And the obligation that a physician administer any subsequent prescriptions on a daily basis, takes away a physician's argument that they just did not know.
The medical profession has already accepted as standard practice the recent, professionally-recommended, and voluntary limits on the over-prescription of antibiotics in order to prevent patient overuse and the subsequent development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
The medical profession needs to similarly accept new, legally-imposed limits on the over-prescription of opioids to prevent patient overuse and the subsequent development of drug addictions.
On a daily basis? Uh no. As a former cancer patient I needed my powerful opioids for weeks until the cancer meds started winning. I could not function without the opioids and I am genuinely worried about this crackdown. Especially with a cancer is under control now, but will return, this idea really worries me.
Anonymous wrote:#NoMorePain or #StopthePain.
Congressional Legislators with morality and strength of character need to introduce the #NoMorePain Bill immediately. The No More Pain Bill would mandate that opioids cannot be prescribed for more than a 10-day supply. After that, any re-prescribing of opioids to the same person within a two-year period, must be administered at the physician's office and under physician supervision on a daily basis.
A universal pharmaceutical records patient database can be established and maintained for opioids only, in order to check that one patient does not repeatedly obtain a single prescription via multiple doctors. And the obligation that a physician administer any subsequent prescriptions on a daily basis, takes away a physician's argument that they just did not know.
The medical profession has already accepted as standard practice the recent, professionally-recommended, and voluntary limits on the over-prescription of antibiotics in order to prevent patient overuse and the subsequent development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
The medical profession needs to similarly accept new, legally-imposed limits on the over-prescription of opioids to prevent patient overuse and the subsequent development of drug addictions.