Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thank you for posting information about the IB program.
I have a question about the IB diploma vs no-diploma as it was mentioned earlier. Let's say a student who is good, takes IB courses including some HL and does not go for diploma. For the discussion sake, let's say this 'good' student has > 4.0 weighted GPA with A's and B's, more than three IB HL/SL courses, SAT low 1500's or ACT 34 and similar level extracurricular activities.
Is there is drawback when not doing full IB diploma in such cases? Does it impact college admissions? Do colleges look down at students who opted to take additional Honors/SL/HL courses but did not go for the diploma?
Please not make this thread another IB bashing. I am just asking questions related to IB.
Colleges look down at students at IB schools who are not pursuing the full diploma. It is just too easy a way for busy admissions officers to put kids in a "no" pile.
My junior ds is doing the full IB diploma and his younger brother likely won't. We have been touring colleges and have asked this question of several admissions officers, including at one Ivy. The answer was resoundingly opposite of what you say. They do not view a student who takes a handful of IB classes differently than they would a student who takes a handful of AP classes. One admissions official told me specifically that they "hold the IB diploma in high regard." Another told me that they consider an IB diploma student to be the equivalent of a full AP course load for two years. The only one who had little regard for IB was JMU, who didn't even mention IB in their presentation, but only talked about AP and dual enrollment. Luckily for us, ds had zero interest in the school anyway.
Admissions offers can be good at telling people what they want to hear. It can translate into application fees.
Even so, non-IB diploma candidates at IB schools are at a disadvantage, and full IB diploma candidates have no advantage over kids who've taken a lot of AP courses. That's just the way it is. If it were different, Whitman and Langley would have IB.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thank you for posting information about the IB program.
I have a question about the IB diploma vs no-diploma as it was mentioned earlier. Let's say a student who is good, takes IB courses including some HL and does not go for diploma. For the discussion sake, let's say this 'good' student has > 4.0 weighted GPA with A's and B's, more than three IB HL/SL courses, SAT low 1500's or ACT 34 and similar level extracurricular activities.
Is there is drawback when not doing full IB diploma in such cases? Does it impact college admissions? Do colleges look down at students who opted to take additional Honors/SL/HL courses but did not go for the diploma?
Please not make this thread another IB bashing. I am just asking questions related to IB.
Colleges look down at students at IB schools who are not pursuing the full diploma. It is just too easy a way for busy admissions officers to put kids in a "no" pile.
My junior ds is doing the full IB diploma and his younger brother likely won't. We have been touring colleges and have asked this question of several admissions officers, including at one Ivy. The answer was resoundingly opposite of what you say. They do not view a student who takes a handful of IB classes differently than they would a student who takes a handful of AP classes. One admissions official told me specifically that they "hold the IB diploma in high regard." Another told me that they consider an IB diploma student to be the equivalent of a full AP course load for two years. The only one who had little regard for IB was JMU, who didn't even mention IB in their presentation, but only talked about AP and dual enrollment. Luckily for us, ds had zero interest in the school anyway.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thank you for posting information about the IB program.
I have a question about the IB diploma vs no-diploma as it was mentioned earlier. Let's say a student who is good, takes IB courses including some HL and does not go for diploma. For the discussion sake, let's say this 'good' student has > 4.0 weighted GPA with A's and B's, more than three IB HL/SL courses, SAT low 1500's or ACT 34 and similar level extracurricular activities.
Is there is drawback when not doing full IB diploma in such cases? Does it impact college admissions? Do colleges look down at students who opted to take additional Honors/SL/HL courses but did not go for the diploma?
Please not make this thread another IB bashing. I am just asking questions related to IB.
Colleges look down at students at IB schools who are not pursuing the full diploma. It is just too easy a way for busy admissions officers to put kids in a "no" pile.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thank you for posting information about the IB program.
I have a question about the IB diploma vs no-diploma as it was mentioned earlier. Let's say a student who is good, takes IB courses including some HL and does not go for diploma. For the discussion sake, let's say this 'good' student has > 4.0 weighted GPA with A's and B's, more than three IB HL/SL courses, SAT low 1500's or ACT 34 and similar level extracurricular activities.
Is there is drawback when not doing full IB diploma in such cases? Does it impact college admissions? Do colleges look down at students who opted to take additional Honors/SL/HL courses but did not go for the diploma?
Please not make this thread another IB bashing. I am just asking questions related to IB.
Colleges look down at students at IB schools who are not pursuing the full diploma. It is just too easy a way for busy admissions officers to put kids in a "no" pile.
New to the whole IB curriculum and just starting to research it for DS. Why would someone take IB classes and not pursue the full diploma? Thank you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thank you for posting information about the IB program.
I have a question about the IB diploma vs no-diploma as it was mentioned earlier. Let's say a student who is good, takes IB courses including some HL and does not go for diploma. For the discussion sake, let's say this 'good' student has > 4.0 weighted GPA with A's and B's, more than three IB HL/SL courses, SAT low 1500's or ACT 34 and similar level extracurricular activities.
Is there is drawback when not doing full IB diploma in such cases? Does it impact college admissions? Do colleges look down at students who opted to take additional Honors/SL/HL courses but did not go for the diploma?
Please not make this thread another IB bashing. I am just asking questions related to IB.
Colleges look down at students at IB schools who are not pursuing the full diploma. It is just too easy a way for busy admissions officers to put kids in a "no" pile.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thank you for posting information about the IB program.
I have a question about the IB diploma vs no-diploma as it was mentioned earlier. Let's say a student who is good, takes IB courses including some HL and does not go for diploma. For the discussion sake, let's say this 'good' student has > 4.0 weighted GPA with A's and B's, more than three IB HL/SL courses, SAT low 1500's or ACT 34 and similar level extracurricular activities.
Is there is drawback when not doing full IB diploma in such cases? Does it impact college admissions? Do colleges look down at students who opted to take additional Honors/SL/HL courses but did not go for the diploma?
Please not make this thread another IB bashing. I am just asking questions related to IB.
Colleges look down at students at IB schools who are not pursuing the full diploma. It is just too easy a way for busy admissions officers to put kids in a "no" pile.
Not sure if this is true. Not even sure if colleges know whether your kid is D bounded or not. Remember IB scores and diploma are given after completion of 12th grade. College admission process is over well before then.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thank you for posting information about the IB program.
I have a question about the IB diploma vs no-diploma as it was mentioned earlier. Let's say a student who is good, takes IB courses including some HL and does not go for diploma. For the discussion sake, let's say this 'good' student has > 4.0 weighted GPA with A's and B's, more than three IB HL/SL courses, SAT low 1500's or ACT 34 and similar level extracurricular activities.
Is there is drawback when not doing full IB diploma in such cases? Does it impact college admissions? Do colleges look down at students who opted to take additional Honors/SL/HL courses but did not go for the diploma?
Please not make this thread another IB bashing. I am just asking questions related to IB.
Colleges look down at students at IB schools who are not pursuing the full diploma. It is just too easy a way for busy admissions officers to put kids in a "no" pile.
Anonymous wrote:Thank you for posting information about the IB program.
I have a question about the IB diploma vs no-diploma as it was mentioned earlier. Let's say a student who is good, takes IB courses including some HL and does not go for diploma. For the discussion sake, let's say this 'good' student has > 4.0 weighted GPA with A's and B's, more than three IB HL/SL courses, SAT low 1500's or ACT 34 and similar level extracurricular activities.
Is there is drawback when not doing full IB diploma in such cases? Does it impact college admissions? Do colleges look down at students who opted to take additional Honors/SL/HL courses but did not go for the diploma?
Please not make this thread another IB bashing. I am just asking questions related to IB.