Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think a test-in magnet in Ward 4 or 5 makes more sense. Don't break up Wilson; add another option for kids that could excel at Wilson but can't get in due to overcrowding/feeder patterns.
I actually think creating a couple of test-in magnet middle schools should be a top priority for DCPS, to provide an iota of hope for parents EOTP that want to stay in the District but can't afford private.
Banneker isn't too far.
And it's incredibly successful, and at capacity. I'm saying this is a winning strategy; I believe it should be duplicated and also extended to middle schools.
Anonymous wrote:So....the plan is to create a majority white magnet because the other magnet is too, how shall we say this, urban?
No.
Anonymous wrote:So....the plan is to create a majority white magnet because the other magnet is too, how shall we say this, urban?
No.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think a test-in magnet in Ward 4 or 5 makes more sense. Don't break up Wilson; add another option for kids that could excel at Wilson but can't get in due to overcrowding/feeder patterns.
I actually think creating a couple of test-in magnet middle schools should be a top priority for DCPS, to provide an iota of hope for parents EOTP that want to stay in the District but can't afford private.
Banneker isn't too far.
And it's incredibly successful, and at capacity. I'm saying this is a winning strategy; I believe it should be duplicated and also extended to middle schools.
No it had seats available a week ago when the list was published.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think a test-in magnet in Ward 4 or 5 makes more sense. Don't break up Wilson; add another option for kids that could excel at Wilson but can't get in due to overcrowding/feeder patterns.
I actually think creating a couple of test-in magnet middle schools should be a top priority for DCPS, to provide an iota of hope for parents EOTP that want to stay in the District but can't afford private.
Banneker isn't too far.
And it's incredibly successful, and at capacity. I'm saying this is a winning strategy; I believe it should be duplicated and also extended to middle schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think a test-in magnet in Ward 4 or 5 makes more sense. Don't break up Wilson; add another option for kids that could excel at Wilson but can't get in due to overcrowding/feeder patterns.
I actually think creating a couple of test-in magnet middle schools should be a top priority for DCPS, to provide an iota of hope for parents EOTP that want to stay in the District but can't afford private.
Banneker isn't too far.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think a test-in magnet in Ward 4 or 5 makes more sense. Don't break up Wilson; add another option for kids that could excel at Wilson but can't get in due to overcrowding/feeder patterns.
I actually think creating a couple of test-in magnet middle schools should be a top priority for DCPS, to provide an iota of hope for parents EOTP that want to stay in the District but can't afford private.
Banneker isn't too far.
Anonymous wrote:I think a test-in magnet in Ward 4 or 5 makes more sense. Don't break up Wilson; add another option for kids that could excel at Wilson but can't get in due to overcrowding/feeder patterns.
I actually think creating a couple of test-in magnet middle schools should be a top priority for DCPS, to provide an iota of hope for parents EOTP that want to stay in the District but can't afford private.