Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Weird to invite one spouse but not the other, no?
I'm PP who said choose option one. I don't think it's weird at all. OP's friend wants OP to be part of her day. Maybe she doesn't even know the spouse, why would she want him there? There is no reason for him to attend.
Not only is it weird, it's extremely rude to invite someone without their spouse.
It wouldn't be terribly rude/weird if the person had called friend up and explained they were having a very intimate wedding that could only accommodate 25, so she'd be getting a solo invite and hope she understands. To get an invite without the spouse out of the blue is strange and poor etiquette.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Decline
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Weird to invite one spouse but not the other, no?
I'm PP who said choose option one. I don't think it's weird at all. OP's friend wants OP to be part of her day. Maybe she doesn't even know the spouse, why would she want him there? There is no reason for him to attend.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Weird to invite one spouse but not the other, no?
I'm PP who said choose option one. I don't think it's weird at all. OP's friend wants OP to be part of her day. Maybe she doesn't even know the spouse, why would she want him there? There is no reason for him to attend.
Anonymous wrote:Weird to invite one spouse but not the other, no?
Anonymous wrote:Decline