Anonymous wrote:If you are in the federal government, failing a PIP leads to either your termination or demotion.
Right now, sit down and in writing respond to the PIP and state:
1. The PIP does not contain your name.
2. The PIP is not individualized to your situation. Do not state that you know an identical PIP was given to your colleague. State that the PIP does not reflect your individual situation and does not appear to be created with you in mind. Leave it at those words.
3. Address the errors and vagueness. You don't have to write at length. Simply state "At page 4, I don't know what "unique work product" means and I will need a definition. "At page 5 you refer to widgets and I don't work on widgets."
Anonymous wrote:I have seen PIPs referenced several times on this forum. What does it stand for?
Anonymous wrote:I have seen PIPs referenced several times on this forum. What does it stand for?
Anonymous wrote:I might first take a simpler approach. "Sally, the forms you sent don't have my name on them. I'll be happy to review them once the forms are updated. Thank you for your time. "
+1Anonymous wrote:If you are in the federal government, failing a PIP leads to either your termination or demotion.
Right now, sit down and in writing respond to the PIP and state:
1. The PIP does not contain your name.
2. The PIP is not individualized to your situation. Do not state that you know an identical PIP was given to your colleague. State that the PIP does not reflect your individual situation and does not appear to be created with you in mind. Leave it at those words.
3. Address the errors and vagueness. You don't have to write at length. Simply state "At page 4, I don't know what "unique work product" means and I will need a definition. "At page 5 you refer to widgets and I don't work on widgets."