Anonymous wrote:Klingle Valley Trail is not exactly resonant with people of color.
Anonymous wrote:I agree OP. We are moderate conservative Republicans living im DC. We love our neighbors , but basically spend a lot of time laughing privately at limo liberal hypocrisy. I enjoy any green space, but can see how the impact on traffic flow has been detrimental to other above ground cross streets. Nothing to be done now except perhaps vote for more political variety so the limo liberals dont have a lock on things?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree OP - and those protesting the Purple Line in Chevy Chase are doing the same thing. This was truly a case of the rich and connected making sure the undesirables lose access - and to insure that their leaf green neighborhood was sure to be priced even further out of reach. The repair would have been costly to do (but not unprecedented) but as OP mentioned - the wealthy enclave blocked the growth of the tax base, the opportunity lost (for those who relied on the access - not to mention keeping traffic) - and it was all disguised as some kind of do good environmentalism. I know its is long ago but I so remember that when this happened. Classic NIMBY that so many who live there would call out in other neighborhoods as racist, punishing poor, etc. DC truly has so much green space and the traffic this denial of access causes is classic haves/have not. The self satisfaction of those touting this new park is nauseating
There's a big difference between turning a road into open space open to the public, and protesting public transportation.
Anonymous wrote:I agree OP - and those protesting the Purple Line in Chevy Chase are doing the same thing. This was truly a case of the rich and connected making sure the undesirables lose access - and to insure that their leaf green neighborhood was sure to be priced even further out of reach. The repair would have been costly to do (but not unprecedented) but as OP mentioned - the wealthy enclave blocked the growth of the tax base, the opportunity lost (for those who relied on the access - not to mention keeping traffic) - and it was all disguised as some kind of do good environmentalism. I know its is long ago but I so remember that when this happened. Classic NIMBY that so many who live there would call out in other neighborhoods as racist, punishing poor, etc. DC truly has so much green space and the traffic this denial of access causes is classic haves/have not. The self satisfaction of those touting this new park is nauseating
Anonymous wrote:Is the path closed to the public?