Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was casually dating 3 people when I met my husband who became lucky number 4. None of them had gotten so serious that we were sleeping together, but meeting the right one was incredibly obvious when you see three wrong ones up in your face.
How do you differentiate "casual dating" from friendship if you weren't physically involved with any of them?
Anonymous wrote:I was casually dating 3 people when I met my husband who became lucky number 4. None of them had gotten so serious that we were sleeping together, but meeting the right one was incredibly obvious when you see three wrong ones up in your face.
Anonymous wrote:I feel as you do but I have to say that the only time in my life I dated two men at the same time, I ended up getting engaged to the man I have now been married to for 11 years. When you date more than one man, you project an air of confidence and a little bit of mystery and perhaps a bit of "the hunt is on."
Anonymous wrote:Your method works for you (and, it would work for me, too). Why do you feel you are supposed to date multiple people at one time? This is not a problem. Date the one person until you are done with him/her.
Anonymous wrote:Your method works for you (and, it would work for me, too). Why do you feel you are supposed to date multiple people at one time? This is not a problem. Date the one person until you are done with him/her.
Anonymous wrote:I know. I know. I'm supposed to date multiple people at a time until one is ready to commit to exclusivity. But honestly? I don't have the interest or time. I would rather evaluate one at a time, and if he's not ready to commit after a month or two, move on. Is this game of "yeah, I'm juggling multiple guys, too" really necessary between work, kids and friends? If it matters, I'm 50, not 20, so I don't need to have kids. Already have them. Pluses and minuses to my planned approach?