Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Obama’s WH used a back channel? Well, go figure............
These are what I call 'articles of convenience'. They come out every time the left's theories begin to come apart.
So you are saying the NSA is wrong? If this is not true, why prosecute Reality for leaking documents stating what the OP is saying?
I think that the media is taking information that we already know about - that Russia, like always, has tried to hack our election - and is putting it out in such as way as to cast doubt on Trump's electoral win.
Was the NSA document that was leaked showing the Russian breach fake? Yes or no?
We don’t know. It could be. Or, they could have been trying to identify a leaker within the agency, so they created a “false flag” to catch the leaker.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Obama’s WH used a back channel? Well, go figure............
These are what I call 'articles of convenience'. They come out every time the left's theories begin to come apart.
So you are saying the NSA is wrong? If this is not true, why prosecute Reality for leaking documents stating what the OP is saying?
DP here. Because she broke the law.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Obama’s WH used a back channel? Well, go figure............
These are what I call 'articles of convenience'. They come out every time the left's theories begin to come apart.
So you are saying the NSA is wrong? If this is not true, why prosecute Reality for leaking documents stating what the OP is saying?
I think that the media is taking information that we already know about - that Russia, like always, has tried to hack our election - and is putting it out in such as way as to cast doubt on Trump's electoral win.
Was the NSA document that was leaked showing the Russian breach fake? Yes or no?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Obama’s WH used a back channel? Well, go figure............
These are what I call 'articles of convenience'. They come out every time the left's theories begin to come apart.
So you are saying the NSA is wrong? If this is not true, why prosecute Reality for leaking documents stating what the OP is saying?
I think that the media is taking information that we already know about - that Russia, like always, has tried to hack our election - and is putting it out in such as way as to cast doubt on Trump's electoral win.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Obama’s WH used a back channel? Well, go figure............
These are what I call 'articles of convenience'. They come out every time the left's theories begin to come apart.
So you are saying the NSA is wrong? If this is not true, why prosecute Reality for leaking documents stating what the OP is saying?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Obama’s WH used a back channel? Well, go figure............
These are what I call 'articles of convenience'. They come out every time the left's theories begin to come apart.
So you are saying the NSA is wrong? If this is not true, why prosecute Reality for leaking documents stating what the OP is saying?
DP here. Because she broke the law.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Obama’s WH used a back channel? Well, go figure............
These are what I call 'articles of convenience'. They come out every time the left's theories begin to come apart.
So you are saying the NSA is wrong? If this is not true, why prosecute Reality for leaking documents stating what the OP is saying?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Obama’s WH used a back channel? Well, go figure............
These are what I call 'articles of convenience'. They come out every time the left's theories begin to come apart.
Anonymous wrote:Obama’s WH used a back channel? Well, go figure............
Anonymous wrote:Obama’s WH used a back channel? Well, go figure............
Anonymous wrote:https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-06-13/russian-breach-of-39-states-threatens-future-u-s-elections
"In Illinois, investigators found evidence that cyber intruders tried to delete or alter voter data. The hackers accessed software designed to be used by poll workers on Election Day, and in at least one state accessed a campaign finance database. Details of the wave of attacks, in the summer and fall of 2016, were provided by three people with direct knowledge of the U.S. investigation into the matter. In all, the Russian hackers hit systems in a total of 39 states, one of them said.
The scope and sophistication so concerned Obama administration officials that they took an unprecedented step -- complaining directly to Moscow over a modern-day “red phone.” In October, two of the people said, the White House contacted the Kremlin on the back channel to offer detailed documents of what it said was Russia’s role in election meddling and to warn that the attacks risked setting off a broader conflict."
Anonymous wrote:Obama’s WH used a back channel? Well, go figure............
Anonymous wrote:Obama’s WH used a back channel? Well, go figure............