+1. I gotta wonder why he's so invested in it? I email a recruiter info about a candidate for a referral then its up to them to land the job. Why did your husband push so hard or why is he so invested? This is business. If the kid finds a better paying job- more power to them.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Need more info here. Did the guy approach your husband and persist? Did he mention he'd like help? Did your DH just offer?
I don't think this kid is under any kind of obligation to take this job. He owes it to himself to do multiple interviews, and to take the best job for him. Perhaps he found out in this process that he was a better candidate than he thought.
It kind of sounds like your DH really wanted to help and pushed the recruiter. He shouldn't have done that unless the kid really begged, and no one should do that if the applicant is not qualified (which it seems he's not).
I should clarify. The kid found out they were hiring and asked my husband if he could put in a good word for him. He did, to the recruiter. He told him to look out for X's resume. The recruiter told him he'd do him one better and find it and start the process.
I don't know why your husband is so upset. I do this for lots of people, and that's where my obligation ends. Some people get hired, some people don't, but after I put in a word, I'm out of it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Need more info here. Did the guy approach your husband and persist? Did he mention he'd like help? Did your DH just offer?
I don't think this kid is under any kind of obligation to take this job. He owes it to himself to do multiple interviews, and to take the best job for him. Perhaps he found out in this process that he was a better candidate than he thought.
It kind of sounds like your DH really wanted to help and pushed the recruiter. He shouldn't have done that unless the kid really begged, and no one should do that if the applicant is not qualified (which it seems he's not).
I should clarify. The kid found out they were hiring and asked my husband if he could put in a good word for him. He did, to the recruiter. He told him to look out for X's resume. The recruiter told him he'd do him one better and find it and start the process.
I don't know why your husband is so upset. I do this for lots of people, and that's where my obligation ends. Some people get hired, some people don't, but after I put in a word, I'm out of it.
You don't know why OP's DH is upset? Really? A lot of people spend time and effort to interview him and finally hire him. For him to back out now makes DH looks really silly, not to mention wasted effort by others on this kid per DH's recommendation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Need more info here. Did the guy approach your husband and persist? Did he mention he'd like help? Did your DH just offer?
I don't think this kid is under any kind of obligation to take this job. He owes it to himself to do multiple interviews, and to take the best job for him. Perhaps he found out in this process that he was a better candidate than he thought.
It kind of sounds like your DH really wanted to help and pushed the recruiter. He shouldn't have done that unless the kid really begged, and no one should do that if the applicant is not qualified (which it seems he's not).
I should clarify. The kid found out they were hiring and asked my husband if he could put in a good word for him. He did, to the recruiter. He told him to look out for X's resume. The recruiter told him he'd do him one better and find it and start the process.
I don't know why your husband is so upset. I do this for lots of people, and that's where my obligation ends. Some people get hired, some people don't, but after I put in a word, I'm out of it.
You don't know why OP's DH is upset? Really? A lot of people spend time and effort to interview him and finally hire him. For him to back out now makes DH looks really silly, not to mention wasted effort by others on this kid per DH's recommendation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Shadowing for a week is a lot. Maybe he didn't like it there?
It sounds like he is not mature enough just tell your DH "Thanks, but..." which is what he should do. He definitely should't have to take the job that isn't right in deference to your DH, but he should probably communicate. Maybe he will after he makes his decision?
If I were DH I wouldn't say anything though. What's gonna come of it? What's the point? He's an adult.
He was all about it, but his wife thinks he will make more money somewhere else (he won't; compare his position to a doc review job offer at a law firm. Gotta start somewhere to get your feet wet. He would absolutely be offered a job from within eventually, but he's never going to without being in doc review first. He truly will have a hard time doing better elsewhere.) His wife thinks he will be offered a better position somewhere else with no experience. This is what he told the recruiter, who basically told him he's passing up a really good offer.
It's really a maturity issue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Need more info here. Did the guy approach your husband and persist? Did he mention he'd like help? Did your DH just offer?
I don't think this kid is under any kind of obligation to take this job. He owes it to himself to do multiple interviews, and to take the best job for him. Perhaps he found out in this process that he was a better candidate than he thought.
It kind of sounds like your DH really wanted to help and pushed the recruiter. He shouldn't have done that unless the kid really begged, and no one should do that if the applicant is not qualified (which it seems he's not).
I should clarify. The kid found out they were hiring and asked my husband if he could put in a good word for him. He did, to the recruiter. He told him to look out for X's resume. The recruiter told him he'd do him one better and find it and start the process.
I don't know why your husband is so upset. I do this for lots of people, and that's where my obligation ends. Some people get hired, some people don't, but after I put in a word, I'm out of it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Need more info here. Did the guy approach your husband and persist? Did he mention he'd like help? Did your DH just offer?
I don't think this kid is under any kind of obligation to take this job. He owes it to himself to do multiple interviews, and to take the best job for him. Perhaps he found out in this process that he was a better candidate than he thought.
It kind of sounds like your DH really wanted to help and pushed the recruiter. He shouldn't have done that unless the kid really begged, and no one should do that if the applicant is not qualified (which it seems he's not).
I should clarify. The kid found out they were hiring and asked my husband if he could put in a good word for him. He did, to the recruiter. He told him to look out for X's resume. The recruiter told him he'd do him one better and find it and start the process.
Anonymous wrote:Shadowing for a week is a lot. Maybe he didn't like it there?
It sounds like he is not mature enough just tell your DH "Thanks, but..." which is what he should do. He definitely should't have to take the job that isn't right in deference to your DH, but he should probably communicate. Maybe he will after he makes his decision?
If I were DH I wouldn't say anything though. What's gonna come of it? What's the point? He's an adult.
Anonymous wrote:^ I mean he IS qualified. Seems that's "not the case" is that I meant.
Anonymous wrote:Need more info here. Did the guy approach your husband and persist? Did he mention he'd like help? Did your DH just offer?
I don't think this kid is under any kind of obligation to take this job. He owes it to himself to do multiple interviews, and to take the best job for him. Perhaps he found out in this process that he was a better candidate than he thought.
It kind of sounds like your DH really wanted to help and pushed the recruiter. He shouldn't have done that unless the kid really begged, and no one should do that if the applicant is not qualified (which it seems he's not).