Anonymous wrote:
Are you serious? Children can't help themselves? Even middle schoolers and teens? Is this society we are to believe is true. Stop playing the victim. They can't learn how to read, ask the school for help, ask guidance counselors for potential jobs? Actually graduate??? Yes, they can help themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I agree 100%
You can't help people that don't want to help themselves. Welfare should come with mandatory volunteer hours if they aren't employed full time. Mandatory drug tests as well. I get them random for my employment, why not them?
The only thing our society should provide free is birth control. So much cheaper than the free abortions and free welfare for 18+ years for the unwanted child b
It does. Since the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, aka "ending welfare as we know it". After which the proportion of poor families who receive cash assistance shrank enormously, and continues to shrink. Currently only about 23 in 100 poor families receive cash assistance from welfare nationwide -- ranging from 4 in 100 in Louisiana to 65 in 100 in California.
http://www.cbpp.org/research/family-income-support/tanf-reaching-few-poor-families
That doesn't look like a safety net to me.
As for, why not mandatory drug testing? Because it costs more than it saves; because people on public assistance use drugs at the same rate as people not on public assistance; and because it's unconstitutional.
Finally, how are children supposed to be helping themselves?
Are you serious? Children can't help themselves? Even middle schoolers and teens? Is this society we are to believe is true. Stop playing the victim. They can't learn how to read, ask the school for help, ask guidance counselors for potential jobs? Actually graduate??? Yes, they can help themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Wrong. As a society we have spent TRILLIONS of dollars on the war on poverty. All it has done is create a leeching dependent class of people that breed more leeching depending children.
I think we need to cut off all aid for 1.5 generations and let nature correct itself.
I hope that you don't consider yourself a Christian.
Are you? Should we all pray for less gun downs and illiterate kids? Can't be the parents fault. It can't be the inner city mentality's fault. Can't be the child's fault. Can't be the school systems fault?
Anonymous wrote:
I agree 100%
You can't help people that don't want to help themselves. Welfare should come with mandatory volunteer hours if they aren't employed full time. Mandatory drug tests as well. I get them random for my employment, why not them?
The only thing our society should provide free is birth control. So much cheaper than the free abortions and free welfare for 18+ years for the unwanted child b
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Wrong. As a society we have spent TRILLIONS of dollars on the war on poverty. All it has done is create a leeching dependent class of people that breed more leeching depending children.
I think we need to cut off all aid for 1.5 generations and let nature correct itself.
I hope that you don't consider yourself a Christian.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This investigative report is depressing.
http://foxbaltimore.com/news/project-baltimore/6-baltimore-schools-no-students-proficient-in-state-tests
It is 2017. How can Baltimore public schools still be so bad?
How many more generations of kids will go without an education before we, as a society, say enough is enough?
Because we, as a society, don't want to commit the resources to the things that would actually improve the chances of children born to poor black parents in cities (actually of children born to poor parents of any race in rural, suburban, or urban areas), and then we blame the schools for our own failure as a society.
Wrong. As a society we have spent TRILLIONS of dollars on the war on poverty. All it has done is create a leeching dependent class of people that breed more leeching depending children.
I think we need to cut off all aid for 1.5 generations and let nature correct itself.
Anonymous wrote:
Wrong. As a society we have spent TRILLIONS of dollars on the war on poverty. All it has done is create a leeching dependent class of people that breed more leeching depending children.
I think we need to cut off all aid for 1.5 generations and let nature correct itself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This investigative report is depressing.
http://foxbaltimore.com/news/project-baltimore/6-baltimore-schools-no-students-proficient-in-state-tests
It is 2017. How can Baltimore public schools still be so bad?
How many more generations of kids will go without an education before we, as a society, say enough is enough?
Because we, as a society, don't want to commit the resources to the things that would actually improve the chances of children born to poor black parents in cities (actually of children born to poor parents of any race in rural, suburban, or urban areas), and then we blame the schools for our own failure as a society.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This investigative report is depressing.
http://foxbaltimore.com/news/project-baltimore/6-baltimore-schools-no-students-proficient-in-state-tests
It is 2017. How can Baltimore public schools still be so bad?
How many more generations of kids will go without an education before we, as a society, say enough is enough?
Because we, as a society, don't want to commit the resources to the things that would actually improve the chances of children born to poor black parents in cities (actually of children born to poor parents of any race in rural, suburban, or urban areas), and then we blame the schools for our own failure as a society.
In your mind, what are the things that we fail to provide?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This investigative report is depressing.
http://foxbaltimore.com/news/project-baltimore/6-baltimore-schools-no-students-proficient-in-state-tests
It is 2017. How can Baltimore public schools still be so bad?
How many more generations of kids will go without an education before we, as a society, say enough is enough?
Because we, as a society, don't want to commit the resources to the things that would actually improve the chances of children born to poor black parents in cities (actually of children born to poor parents of any race in rural, suburban, or urban areas), and then we blame the schools for our own failure as a society.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This investigative report is depressing.
http://foxbaltimore.com/news/project-baltimore/6-baltimore-schools-no-students-proficient-in-state-tests
It is 2017. How can Baltimore public schools still be so bad?
How many more generations of kids will go without an education before we, as a society, say enough is enough?
Because we, as a society, don't want to commit the resources to the things that would actually improve the chances of children born to poor black parents in cities (actually of children born to poor parents of any race in rural, suburban, or urban areas), and then we blame the schools for our own failure as a society.
Anonymous wrote:This investigative report is depressing.
http://foxbaltimore.com/news/project-baltimore/6-baltimore-schools-no-students-proficient-in-state-tests
It is 2017. How can Baltimore public schools still be so bad?
How many more generations of kids will go without an education before we, as a society, say enough is enough?