Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You have the education.
You have the career.
You have the money for a home and childcare.
You have IVF at your disposal.

You don't need men.

Please leave

No the PP, but what's wrong with this response?

Because you're robbing your child of having a father? B/c every single study done shows children do better in 2-parent households? Especially boys.

So let me get this straight. If I can provide a loving stable home for a child, I should not have one because the one thing I don't have is a partner? It would be better in your eyes to settle for a man, any man, then embark on this journey by myself? And when the marriage goes south, because I settled, it's better that the children live through divorce? Or maybe you think that I should have to have to suck it up and endure the marriage I settled for because I wanted children? Then again, what if he leaves against my wishes--you know because you can't control if someone wants to be in a relationship.

Anonymous wrote:Or we just don't want kids?

Amen, sistah (or brotha)!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Or we just don't want kids?

Mental defect if this is the case and nature is correcting course by preventing this genetic mutation

You are too funny.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You have the education.
You have the career.
You have the money for a home and childcare.
You have IVF at your disposal.

You don't need men.

Please leave

No the PP, but what's wrong with this response?

Because you're robbing your child of having a father? B/c every single study done shows children do better in 2-parent households? Especially boys.

lol Were those studies done by men?? Kids are doing the worst with divorced parents. They do the best in a stable household regardless...single, or married and together.

Anonymous wrote:Or we just don't want kids?

Mental defect if this is the case and nature is correcting course by preventing this genetic mutation

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You have the education.
You have the career.
You have the money for a home and childcare.
You have IVF at your disposal.

You don't need men.

Please leave

No the PP, but what's wrong with this response?

Because you're robbing your child of having a father? B/c every single study done shows children do better in 2-parent households? Especially boys.

Who needs boys. They grow into men and they are clearly surplus to requirements.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You have the education.
You have the career.
You have the money for a home and childcare.
You have IVF at your disposal.

You don't need men.

Please leave

No the PP, but what's wrong with this response?

Because you're robbing your child of having a father? B/c every single study done shows children do better in 2-parent households? Especially boys.

Or we just don't want kids?

Women have more opportunities, take those opportunities, raise their expectations, and the world doesn't cough up men who meet those strict requirements. Obviously men are to blame.

I Don't think single incomes and no partner help would work with raising a child. Career suicide and mental suicide.

Anonymous wrote:You have the education.
You have the career.
You have the money for a home and childcare.
You have IVF at your disposal.

You don't need men.

This is what I'm seeing more and more. Women want the family without a man. If they truly want kids it's going to be with some random guy, a bf, or the sperm bank. No custody battles, no exes bothering them, no ex in laws and all the other horrible dilemmas people get themselves into.

I don't see anything wrong with it. It's all about personal choices.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You have the education.
You have the career.
You have the money for a home and childcare.
You have IVF at your disposal.

You don't need men.

Please leave

No the PP, but what's wrong with this response?

Anonymous wrote:You have the education.
You have the career.
You have the money for a home and childcare.
You have IVF at your disposal.

You don't need men.

Please leave

You have the education.
You have the career.
You have the money for a home and childcare.
You have IVF at your disposal.

You don't need men.

http://nypost.com/2017/05/13/childish-men-are-to-blame-for-women-having-kids-late-in-life/

The only flaw with this article is that I don't think career-women are necessarily looking for an equal as much as a "better" (higher earner).

"The census labels childless college-educated women over age 35 the “delayer boom” — as if we gathered together in a collective conspiracy in defiance of motherhood.

The trouble with all this finger pointing is that it leaves out half of the baby-making equation: men.

Women want an equal partner, but there are increasingly fewer candidates to choose from. The census reports that “the average adult woman in the US is more likely to be a college graduate than the average adult man.” Moreover, today’s young, childless female city-dwellers with college degrees are out-earning their male counterparts by 8 cents on the dollar. Their higher incomes may be why they are less likely (29 percent) to be living with their parents than single men (35 percent)."