Anonymous wrote:They say your childhood hair color actually looks the best with your skin tone. For a lot of white woman, that is some shade of blonde. I was a medium blonde as a child but medium brunette by my teen years. I look 100% better as a medium, "natural" blonde. I've tried going back to brown (and red and other things), but not a single person in my life cares for it or thinks it looks natural.
I think it has less to do with "matching skin tone" but more to do with the fact that blonde hair is a signifier of youth because many children have blonde hair that turn dark over time.
Youth / fertility = beauty. Many people who are bottle blondes wouldn't get a second look without the fake color. Think Gwyneth Paltrow; she's naturally a brunette. If you look at pictures of her as a brunette she looks nowhere near as good as when she has blonde hair.
You look better as a blonde because it makes you look younger than you are. The fact that you were blonde as a child doesn't mean that your bottle blonde is somehow more natural now.
This is why personally, I think that brunettes that are beautiful are actually beautiful. Many blondes that people deem as beautiful or pretty really aren't. But natural blondes that make their hair darker that are still beautiful are actually beautiful.