Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are these PK cheaters? Why would they otherwise want to be in DCPS vs their suburban system?
I don't know. There are at least a few at our school from Silver Spring. I'd imagine in some cases they feel the DCPS is a better option--other times, I wonder if it's just convenience to their work.
It's convenience to family for aftercare and pickups, too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are these PK cheaters? Why would they otherwise want to be in DCPS vs their suburban system?
I don't know. There are at least a few at our school from Silver Spring. I'd imagine in some cases they feel the DCPS is a better option--other times, I wonder if it's just convenience to their work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are these PK cheaters? Why would they otherwise want to be in DCPS vs their suburban system?
I don't know. There are at least a few at our school from Silver Spring. I'd imagine in some cases they feel the DCPS is a better option--other times, I wonder if it's just convenience to their work.
Anonymous wrote:Are these PK cheaters? Why would they otherwise want to be in DCPS vs their suburban system?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have zero sympathy for residency cheaters.
A number of them seem to have day jobs with the DC government.
Anonymous wrote:I have zero sympathy for residency cheaters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cutting a school's budget by 10k a violation is certainly a way for administrators to be more vigilant.
$10k roughly represents what they'll lose per head if parents are cheating.
I'm going to guess this is just a compliane exercise and/or fair warning for the cheaters to get their ducks in a row.
Anonymous wrote:Cutting a school's budget by 10k a violation is certainly a way for administrators to be more vigilant.