Anonymous wrote:I seriously think we must have the last lottery #. We are in the 200s for all charters and our lowest WL is # 32 for a DCPS that would be suitable for pk3-4. Really depressed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sign me up for this thread! We are IB for Maury and are NUMBER 44! It is insane that there are at least 44 families who didn't get in. I am so pissed they expanded the boundaries just a few years ago. So stupid and short sighted.
My number must have been so bad. I didn't get in to Miner, Appletree in LP or SW either.
What's your Miner #? Appletree LP is pretty selective now, things have changed a lot in the past 2 years.
We are 34 for Miner, 4 for AT SW, and 120 for AT LP.
Anonymous wrote:Maury and Brent seem impossible to get in for ECE without sibling preference. I don't know if other Hill schools are as bad as these 2 schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sign me up for this thread! We are IB for Maury and are NUMBER 44! It is insane that there are at least 44 families who didn't get in. I am so pissed they expanded the boundaries just a few years ago. So stupid and short sighted.
My number must have been so bad. I didn't get in to Miner, Appletree in LP or SW either.
What's your Miner #? Appletree LP is pretty selective now, things have changed a lot in the past 2 years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sign me up for this thread! We are IB for Maury and are NUMBER 44! It is insane that there are at least 44 families who didn't get in. I am so pissed they expanded the boundaries just a few years ago. So stupid and short sighted.
My number must have been so bad. I didn't get in to Miner, Appletree in LP or SW either.
Anonymous wrote:Sign me up for this thread! We are IB for Maury and are NUMBER 44! It is insane that there are at least 44 families who didn't get in. I am so pissed they expanded the boundaries just a few years ago. So stupid and short sighted.