Anonymous wrote:I though discretion ended with the last boundary change?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every year you need to provide evidence of residency. If you are no longer IB, it is up to the principal to allow you to re-enroll.
And that's the case even if we initially got in through the lottery? (in-boundary)
The only way to get into PreK is through the lottery.
Anonymous wrote:Anyone know about Murch, Hearst, or Eaton?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every year you need to provide evidence of residency. If you are no longer IB, it is up to the principal to allow you to re-enroll.
And that's the case even if we initially got in through the lottery? (in-boundary)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every year you need to provide evidence of residency. If you are no longer IB, it is up to the principal to allow you to re-enroll.
And that's the case even if we initially got in through the lottery? (in-boundary)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every year you need to provide evidence of residency. If you are no longer IB, it is up to the principal to allow you to re-enroll.
And that's the case even if we initially got in through the lottery? (in-boundary)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every year you need to provide evidence of residency. If you are no longer IB, it is up to the principal to allow you to re-enroll.
And that's the case even if we initially got in through the lottery? (in-boundary)
Anonymous wrote:Every year you need to provide evidence of residency. If you are no longer IB, it is up to the principal to allow you to re-enroll.