Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NIH does crucial work but there's a lot of fat. I could cut the budget 10% today, 10% if I worked a while on it.
Please tell us exactly what you would cut. Inquiring minds would like to know.
Anonymous wrote:Over ten years at NIH and I don't see any fat. Funding was flat for a long time, raises were nonexistent. These are highly specialized scientists dedicating their lives to finding cures for some of the most devastating diseases. Not to mention responding to crises such as Zika, Ebola, and others.
I heard that Trump said he was going to "eliminate all diseases". How is that consistent with a nearly 20% cut at NIH, which includes not just salaries and programs at NIH, but grant funding for scientists around the country?
Anonymous wrote:NIH does crucial work but there's a lot of fat. I could cut the budget 10% today, 10% if I worked a while on it.
Anonymous wrote:NIH does crucial work but there's a lot of fat. I could cut the budget 10% today, 10% if I worked a while on it.
Anonymous wrote:Trump's throwing red meat to his dumb base. One can only hope saner heads prevail.
