Anonymous wrote:Maybe it will be, but Comey has asked DOJ to publicly state that there was no wiretapping of Trump, saying it didn't happen.
If they do, it will be a remarkable rebuke of a sitting president.
"The F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, asked the Justice Department this weekend to publicly reject President Trump’s assertion that President Barack Obama ordered the tapping of Mr. Trump’s phones, senior American officials said on Sunday. Mr. Comey has argued that the highly charged claim is false and must be corrected, they said, but the department has not released any such statement.
Mr. Comey made the request on Saturday after Mr. Trump leveled his allegation on Twitter. Mr. Comey has been working to get the Justice Department to knock down Mr. Trump’s claim because there is no evidence to support it and it insinuates that the F.B.I. broke the law, the officials said."
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/05/us/politics/trump-seeks-inquiry-into-allegations-that-obama-tapped-his-phones.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump keeps saying he was wiretapped in Trump Tower, but wouldn't it be more likely that Russian government agents were under surveillance/having their calls secretly monitored (which the government does with all foreign leaders, and they all do the same to us), and conversations of theirs with the Trump campaign were then found? I REALLY don't get what he hopes to accomplish by going public with this.
Yes, of course that's the most likely scenario and Trump's camp knows that.
They've also known for at least six weeks that there's intelligence on their dealings with Russia. If they had a problem with learning that they'd been under surveillance, they'd have raised it then.
Six weeks to come up with a strategy and the best they can do is return to the campaign playbook. Blame Hillary/Obama.
Anonymous wrote:Trump keeps saying he was wiretapped in Trump Tower, but wouldn't it be more likely that Russian government agents were under surveillance/having their calls secretly monitored (which the government does with all foreign leaders, and they all do the same to us), and conversations of theirs with the Trump campaign were then found? I REALLY don't get what he hopes to accomplish by going public with this.
Anonymous wrote:Trump keeps saying he was wiretapped in Trump Tower, but wouldn't it be more likely that Russian government agents were under surveillance/having their calls secretly monitored (which the government does with all foreign leaders, and they all do the same to us), and conversations of theirs with the Trump campaign were then found? I REALLY don't get what he hopes to accomplish by going public with this.
Anonymous wrote:Trump keeps saying he was wiretapped in Trump Tower, but wouldn't it be more likely that Russian government agents were under surveillance/having their calls secretly monitored (which the government does with all foreign leaders, and they all do the same to us), and conversations of theirs with the Trump campaign were then found? I REALLY don't get what he hopes to accomplish by going public with this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:House Intelligence Committee chair, Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., said the allegations will become part of his panel's investigation. The committee 'will make inquiries into whether the government was conducting surveillance activities on any political party's campaign officials or surrogates,' Nunes' statement read.
While on the Senate side, Intelligence Committee member, Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., said 'I’m sure that this matter will be a part of that inquiry,' during a discussion on Fox News Sunday.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4283584/White-House-asks-Congress-look-wire-tapping-claims.html#ixzz4aU6umnHM
How are the Republicans going to thread the needle on this one? If there was surveillance of Trump, they would also need to go into WHY it was happening and that ends up being the can of worms that damages the Republicans. Merely saying "he was surveiled" isn't going to cut it. The full story would have to come out - if it doesn't then it makes the Republicans look dishonest.
Anonymous wrote:
How are the Republicans going to thread the needle on this one? If there was surveillance of Trump, they would also need to go into WHY it was happening and that ends up being the can of worms that damages the Republicans. Merely saying "he was surveiled" isn't going to cut it. The full story would have to come out - if it doesn't then it makes the Republicans look dishonest.
Anonymous wrote:House Intelligence Committee chair, Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., said the allegations will become part of his panel's investigation. The committee 'will make inquiries into whether the government was conducting surveillance activities on any political party's campaign officials or surrogates,' Nunes' statement read.
While on the Senate side, Intelligence Committee member, Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., said 'I’m sure that this matter will be a part of that inquiry,' during a discussion on Fox News Sunday.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4283584/White-House-asks-Congress-look-wire-tapping-claims.html#ixzz4aU6umnHM