Anonymous wrote:I'm also not a fan of Indian although I will have it on occasion when we go out with friends and they elect to have Indian.
It really is, to put it crudely, overspiced brown mush in varying guises for the most part. I can recognize and appreciate the culinary heritage built around spices and the use of spices as the flavors that dominate and enhance the dish, whereas the raw ingredients of the meats or vegetables or grains are far less important other than a vehicle for the spices. It's different from the traditional European culinary heritages where the success of the dish is based on enhancing the flavors of the raw ingredients and spices are only subtle enhancements to strengthen the original flavors.
Anonymous wrote:I'm also not a fan of Indian although I will have it on occasion when we go out with friends and they elect to have Indian.
It really is, to put it crudely, overspiced brown mush in varying guises for the most part. I can recognize and appreciate the culinary heritage built around spices and the use of spices as the flavors that dominate and enhance the dish, whereas the raw ingredients of the meats or vegetables or grains are far less important other than a vehicle for the spices. It's different from the traditional European culinary heritages where the success of the dish is based on enhancing the flavors of the raw ingredients and spices are only subtle enhancements to strengthen the original flavors.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most Indian restaurants use a base sauce, which is not anything like real Indian food with fresh spices etc. So chances are, OP has never eaten proper Indian food.
So you can't really dislike what you have never really had.
+1
Real, well-prepared Indian food is beautifully and exquisitely balanced and nothing like the crap for passes as "Indian food" in 95% of US restaurants.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's okay to not like Indian food. It may just not be your thing. No need to bend over backwards to 'get it'.
At least a billion people still love it!
I guess you're right. It's just that i always hear people talk about it like "oh man I am dying for some Indian" or " oh man I'm craving some (Indian dish)". People don't just like it, they love it. Makes me wonder if I'm not trying the right things or something...
Anonymous wrote:Most Indian restaurants use a base sauce, which is not anything like real Indian food with fresh spices etc. So chances are, OP has never eaten proper Indian food.
So you can't really dislike what you have never really had.
Anonymous wrote:I'm also not a fan of Indian although I will have it on occasion when we go out with friends and they elect to have Indian.
It really is, to put it crudely, overspiced brown mush in varying guises for the most part. I can recognize and appreciate the culinary heritage built around spices and the use of spices as the flavors that dominate and enhance the dish, whereas the raw ingredients of the meats or vegetables or grains are far less important other than a vehicle for the spices. It's different from the traditional European culinary heritages where the success of the dish is based on enhancing the flavors of the raw ingredients and spices are only subtle enhancements to strengthen the original flavors.
Anonymous wrote:It's okay to not like Indian food. It may just not be your thing. No need to bend over backwards to 'get it'.
At least a billion people still love it!