Anonymous wrote:It is an law that is long overdue for changes
There is no right in he constitution
Chinese tourists are not ...
"subject to the jurisdiction thereof"
Century ago, it didn’t matter very much that a simple practice began that has now grown into a massive issue of birthright citizenship or the anchor baby agenda,” said King. “When automatic citizenship started being granted to all babies born in the United States, our lawmakers missed the clause in the 14th Amendment that says, ‘And subject to the jurisdiction thereof.’ So once the practice began, it grew out of proportion and today between 340,000 and 750,000 babies are born in America each year that get automatic citizenship even though both parents are illegal. I know of no other country in the world that does this, and it must end.
Anonymous wrote:It is an law that is long overdue for changes
There is no right in he constitution
Chinese tourists are not ...
"subject to the jurisdiction thereof"
Century ago, it didn’t matter very much that a simple practice began that has now grown into a massive issue of birthright citizenship or the anchor baby agenda,” said King. “When automatic citizenship started being granted to all babies born in the United States, our lawmakers missed the clause in the 14th Amendment that says, ‘And subject to the jurisdiction thereof.’ So once the practice began, it grew out of proportion and today between 340,000 and 750,000 babies are born in America each year that get automatic citizenship even though both parents are illegal. I know of no other country in the world that does this, and it must end.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Um of course Chinese tourists are subject to US jurisdiction. Otherwise they could just come here and commit all sorts of crimes and fraud and go home.
BEIJING — When Ma Fahong approached the immigration desk at Los Angeles International Airport, the customs agent had only two questions for her.
“Why are you coming to the U.S.?”
“I’m here to have a baby.”
“How much cash do you have on you?”
“I only have $1,000 in cash, but I have a debit card with much more in the bank.”
Passport stamped. Welcome to Los Angeles.
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/7187180
Do you have an actual response to my point?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Um of course Chinese tourists are subject to US jurisdiction. Otherwise they could just come here and commit all sorts of crimes and fraud and go home.
BEIJING — When Ma Fahong approached the immigration desk at Los Angeles International Airport, the customs agent had only two questions for her.
“Why are you coming to the U.S.?”
“I’m here to have a baby.”
“How much cash do you have on you?”
“I only have $1,000 in cash, but I have a debit card with much more in the bank.”
Passport stamped. Welcome to Los Angeles.
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/7187180
Anonymous wrote:Um of course Chinese tourists are subject to US jurisdiction. Otherwise they could just come here and commit all sorts of crimes and fraud and go home.