Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I had this fight with Loudoun and lost. Milk is included. A tiny (half size) water bottle is .75 cents extra. Its bull$shit. But they wouldn't budge. So my daughter buys lunch with no drink and when she gets thirsty walks across the cafeteria to the water fountain. She has a bottle of water in the classroom, but doesn't feel like carrying it to lunch.
So stupid. You know the milk costs more than the water bottle I can buy at Costco for 4 cents.
It is stupid, you're right, but you should send in an extra smaller water or have your daughter bring lunch from home. In FCPS you are actually required to take the milk. You aren't allowed to buy a lunch without a drink. THAT is stupid. And incredibly wasteful. Nothing irritates me more than knowing about all of the waste that happens in public schools while they complain about the budget and ask for more of the taxpayers money.
I am a parent who put vegetables on my child's plate for years before he ate them consistently. I didn't consider that waste. I considered it an investment in healthy eating and expanding his palate. And it worked, but itbwasba long game.
I teach in the city, and I consider my students to be worth the same investment.
Yeah, that's not the same thing at all though. You're the parent. The school isn't going to get kids to drink milk and eat foods they don't like just because they require it to complete a lunch purchase. I also give my kid vegetables and fruit with every meal, and he likes all of them except eggplant and tomatoes, but eating at school and at home are two different things. It
is wasteful what they do in fcps. The amount of perfectly good food and unopened milks in the trash every day is the evidence. If you deny that then you aren't being honest.