These folks were not "technocrats" - that would imply that they knew what they were doing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I honestly think it wouldn't have mattered. There was so much shady going on with voter suppression, Russian propaganda, etc. There is no way Hillary would have lost a free and fair election to Trump and there's no way she was going to win this one with the deck stacked against her.

Give me my tinfoil hat now but I truly believe that.

Tinfoil hat. We fucked up dunker election.

^^PP here. It may not be tinfoil hat so much as naivety - after all that's happened I STILL refuse to believe that our country could be so stupid as to vote him in. There MUST be something else at play.

Anonymous wrote:I honestly think it wouldn't have mattered. There was so much shady going on with voter suppression, Russian propaganda, etc. There is no way Hillary would have lost a free and fair election to Trump and there's no way she was going to win this one with the deck stacked against her.

Give me my tinfoil hat now but I truly believe that.

Tinfoil hat. We fucked up dunker election.

I honestly think it wouldn't have mattered. There was so much shady going on with voter suppression, Russian propaganda, etc. There is no way Hillary would have lost a free and fair election to Trump and there's no way she was going to win this one with the deck stacked against her.

Give me my tinfoil hat now but I truly believe that.

Anonymous wrote:OMG. What if the voice voice on the phone to the SEIU sounded like "U vust not goah to Meeesh-ee-gone." ?

We need an independent commission to investigate this. Please donate to the Green money to fund this effort.

ugggghhhh. so DC!!! grrrrrrr

Anonymous wrote:According to Politico today, they wanted to trick the Trump team into thinking Iowa was their main concern.

Once again, the technocrats fuck things up that grassroots organizers have been nailing for years. Fire them all (from a cannon) and may they never work on our elections again.

I'm sure Putin bribed them.

Here's the link.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/michigan-hillary-clinton-trump-232547

That the story opens with political types assuming they're smarter than union organizers is so pitch-perfect liberal.

OMG. What if the voice voice on the phone to the SEIU sounded like "U vust not goah to Meeesh-ee-gone." ?

Anonymous wrote:It appears that the technocrats won the election for Trump. Trump's analytics were great. I mean that literally.

I guess it warrants mentioning that Politico reported all summer that HRC had the best ground game ever, because that's what the people implementing HRC's ground game told them.

I'm starting to believe the rumors that Mooks and others hid the bad news so they could stay employed. It's like in a company I used to work for where the managers reported great numbers all the way until December and then left for new jobs after cashing paychecks off the inflated numbers.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it really so hard to provide a link to the article you intend to discuss?

I read the print version. Bing is your friend.

OP, posting a link to the article you're discussing is your job.

Anonymous wrote:Is it really so hard to provide a link to the article you intend to discuss?

I read the print version. Bing is your friend.

Is it really so hard to provide a link to the article you intend to discuss?

It appears that the technocrats won the election for Trump. Trump's analytics were great. I mean that literally.

According to Politico today, they wanted to trick the Trump team into thinking Iowa was their main concern.

Once again, the technocrats fuck things up that grassroots organizers have been nailing for years. Fire them all (from a cannon) and may they never work on our elections again.