Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Ivanka Trump isn't signing off on uranium deals to Russia aka Clinton and Obama. She's in fashion. Do I care?
What?! Clinton was SoS and Obama was POTUS. You can disagree with their policies, but you can't disagree that they should have been involved with foreign affairs.
She and Kushner have NO place being there. If she isn't in foreign affairs, no reason to be at meeting. If she's running a company with conflicts of interest, then again, even more of a reason why she should not be there.
The fact that they do all this with no reporters in the room is just a signal to everyone that they plan to do whatever the F they want, regardless of the laws. Dangerous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Ivanka Trump isn't signing off on uranium deals to Russia aka Clinton and Obama. She's in fashion. Do I care?
What?! Clinton was SoS and Obama was POTUS. You can disagree with their policies, but you can't disagree that they should have been involved with foreign affairs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Ivanka Trump isn't signing off on uranium deals to Russia aka Clinton and Obama. She's in fashion. Do I care?
What?! Clinton was SoS and Obama was POTUS. You can disagree with their policies, but you can't disagree that they should have been involved with foreign affairs.
Anonymous wrote:
Ivanka Trump isn't signing off on uranium deals to Russia aka Clinton and Obama. She's in fashion. Do I care?
Anonymous wrote:http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/ivanka-trump-business-deal-during-japan-abe-meeting
"When Donald Trump met with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe on Nov. 17, his first such meeting with a foreign leader as president-elect, Ivanka Trump's fashion company was holding a private viewing of her products in Japan, a small part in a deal two years in the making, the New York Times reported Sunday.
Ivanka Trump is expected to reach a licensing deal with the Japanese apparel company Sanei International, whose parent company has as a majority shareholder the Development Bank of Japan, which is owned by the Japanese government, according to the Times report."
This is just lovely. They are unbelievably greedy and put their personal business profits ahead of any real interest in America's well-being. I would love to see what Republicans would say if Michelle Obama owned an international company and sat in on her husband's meetings with heads of state.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Back to the Trumps...
The Bannon profile someone posted on another thread is interesting in the context of Trump's business dealings:
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/steve-bannon-trump-tower-interview-trumps-strategist-plots-new-political-movement-948747
Agree or disagree with his premises, you have to admit that Bannon has a well thought-out strategy that is decidedly focused on the middle-class economy at the expense of the billionaire elites. And while Trump may be able to find the words to sell Bannon's message, I don't think he believes in it in the same way. Bannon, in cut-offs and threadbare t-shirts could not be more opposite to Trump in his gold-plated palace. Bannon's utopia can only happen at the expense of people like Trump (well, Ivanka more than Trump, real estate moguls can do fine in an infrastructure-spending driven economy).
So how does that tension play out. Does Trump let Bannon continue to push policies that hurt his own bottom line? Or does Trump push back and realign himself with the corporatist Republicans? Bannon's pretty smart, so maybe he finds a way to shield Trump from the negative effects on people like him of his policies. But I can't help feeling like there's something not so neat about Bannon's governing strategy...which is quite different from his tightly-developed campaigning one.
I don't take anything Bannon says at face value. His rhetoric is laced with dog whistles. He doesn't care about the middle class economy. What he cares about is destroying "globalization." This is code for "foreigners."
Anonymous wrote:Back to the Trumps...
The Bannon profile someone posted on another thread is interesting in the context of Trump's business dealings:
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/steve-bannon-trump-tower-interview-trumps-strategist-plots-new-political-movement-948747
Agree or disagree with his premises, you have to admit that Bannon has a well thought-out strategy that is decidedly focused on the middle-class economy at the expense of the billionaire elites. And while Trump may be able to find the words to sell Bannon's message, I don't think he believes in it in the same way. Bannon, in cut-offs and threadbare t-shirts could not be more opposite to Trump in his gold-plated palace. Bannon's utopia can only happen at the expense of people like Trump (well, Ivanka more than Trump, real estate moguls can do fine in an infrastructure-spending driven economy).
So how does that tension play out. Does Trump let Bannon continue to push policies that hurt his own bottom line? Or does Trump push back and realign himself with the corporatist Republicans? Bannon's pretty smart, so maybe he finds a way to shield Trump from the negative effects on people like him of his policies. But I can't help feeling like there's something not so neat about Bannon's governing strategy...which is quite different from his tightly-developed campaigning one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/ivanka-trump-business-deal-during-japan-abe-meeting
"When Donald Trump met with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe on Nov. 17, his first such meeting with a foreign leader as president-elect, Ivanka Trump's fashion company was holding a private viewing of her products in Japan, a small part in a deal two years in the making, the New York Times reported Sunday.
Ivanka Trump is expected to reach a licensing deal with the Japanese apparel company Sanei International, whose parent company has as a majority shareholder the Development Bank of Japan, which is owned by the Japanese government, according to the Times report."
This is just lovely. They are unbelievably greedy and put their personal business profits ahead of any real interest in America's well-being. I would love to see what Republicans would say if Michelle Obama owned an international company and sat in on her husband's meetings with heads of state.
This is too preposterous to even make into a fake news story!![]()
![]()
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Back to the Trumps...
The Bannon profile someone posted on another thread is interesting in the context of Trump's business dealings:
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/steve-bannon-trump-tower-interview-trumps-strategist-plots-new-political-movement-948747
Agree or disagree with his premises, you have to admit that Bannon has a well thought-out strategy that is decidedly focused on the middle-class economy at the expense of the billionaire elites. And while Trump may be able to find the words to sell Bannon's message, I don't think he believes in it in the same way. Bannon, in cut-offs and threadbare t-shirts could not be more opposite to Trump in his gold-plated palace. Bannon's utopia can only happen at the expense of people like Trump (well, Ivanka more than Trump, real estate moguls can do fine in an infrastructure-spending driven economy).
So how does that tension play out. Does Trump let Bannon continue to push policies that hurt his own bottom line? Or does Trump push back and realign himself with the corporatist Republicans? Bannon's pretty smart, so maybe he finds a way to shield Trump from the negative effects on people like him of his policies. But I can't help feeling like there's something not so neat about Bannon's governing strategy...which is quite different from his tightly-developed campaigning one.
Hollywood Reporter? Color me impressed.
Anonymous wrote:Back to the Trumps...
The Bannon profile someone posted on another thread is interesting in the context of Trump's business dealings:
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/steve-bannon-trump-tower-interview-trumps-strategist-plots-new-political-movement-948747
Agree or disagree with his premises, you have to admit that Bannon has a well thought-out strategy that is decidedly focused on the middle-class economy at the expense of the billionaire elites. And while Trump may be able to find the words to sell Bannon's message, I don't think he believes in it in the same way. Bannon, in cut-offs and threadbare t-shirts could not be more opposite to Trump in his gold-plated palace. Bannon's utopia can only happen at the expense of people like Trump (well, Ivanka more than Trump, real estate moguls can do fine in an infrastructure-spending driven economy).
So how does that tension play out. Does Trump let Bannon continue to push policies that hurt his own bottom line? Or does Trump push back and realign himself with the corporatist Republicans? Bannon's pretty smart, so maybe he finds a way to shield Trump from the negative effects on people like him of his policies. But I can't help feeling like there's something not so neat about Bannon's governing strategy...which is quite different from his tightly-developed campaigning one.
Anonymous wrote:http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/ivanka-trump-business-deal-during-japan-abe-meeting
"When Donald Trump met with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe on Nov. 17, his first such meeting with a foreign leader as president-elect, Ivanka Trump's fashion company was holding a private viewing of her products in Japan, a small part in a deal two years in the making, the New York Times reported Sunday.
Ivanka Trump is expected to reach a licensing deal with the Japanese apparel company Sanei International, whose parent company has as a majority shareholder the Development Bank of Japan, which is owned by the Japanese government, according to the Times report."
This is just lovely. They are unbelievably greedy and put their personal business profits ahead of any real interest in America's well-being. I would love to see what Republicans would say if Michelle Obama owned an international company and sat in on her husband's meetings with heads of state.