Anonymous
Post 11/22/2016 14:08     Subject: Re:Is there any basis for zodiac signs?


The problem with Geminis is they tend to believe in astrology.
Anonymous
Post 11/22/2016 12:24     Subject: Re:Is there any basis for zodiac signs?

As a scorpio who thought that Pisces was going to work out let me tell you....run, run now and run far from the Pisces. So much emotional baggage just laid out before you. Nice guy but really a punk when you look back at it all. Also has a hidden really nasty side to them. They tend to be beautiful people so they get lots of attention and cheating is always an option for them and they think of it as a great romance that was meant to be, until it isn't. Avoid Pisces at all cost
Anonymous
Post 11/22/2016 12:02     Subject: Is there any basis for zodiac signs?

Anonymous wrote:I am an Aries-Taurus cusper. Sounds about right.


Just noticed Hitler was an A-T cusper
Anonymous
Post 11/22/2016 11:59     Subject: Is there any basis for zodiac signs?

I am an Aries-Taurus cusper. Sounds about right.
Anonymous
Post 11/22/2016 11:50     Subject: Re:Is there any basis for zodiac signs?

OP here - I find scorpians to be so honest and that is why I really enjoy my friends that are so close to me. I know anything they say to me will be the dead on truth. This Pisces seems a little emotional and I am not a very emotional person, or at least don't let them rule me. I have never seen this level of emotion in a man.
Anonymous
Post 11/22/2016 11:40     Subject: Is there any basis for zodiac signs?

Anonymous wrote:I'm a Gemini too, an air sign (communication/motivation) and I definitely think there is an underlying commonality, which people can choose to change, but are still predisposed too.

Pisces are water (feeling/nurturing) signs, deep, feeling, intuitive people, who are very intelligent and sensitive. They can mope, or be self-pitying, but also have a wonderful sense of humor. My best friend, and a number of relatives are Pisces.

Oddly, I don't get along very well with Scorpios (water). They are a little too boisterous for me.



And they are incredibly indecisive. Every Pisces I know has the worst time making decisions.
Anonymous
Post 11/22/2016 11:36     Subject: Is there any basis for zodiac signs?

Anonymous wrote:"Belief in astrology" = failed IQ test



Said Plato, and Aristotle, never.

Acknowledgement of possibility of correlation between physics and physiological behaviors in atoms that are created doesn't make you stupid. Rather, being on the receiving end of validated information and never exploring a scientific theory that could validate and reveal unknown facts increases intellectual capacity. Granted, no one places time into giving serious thought to validating astrology as a science, but until it is validated, you would sacrifice IQ points to simply dismiss the possibility.
Anonymous
Post 11/22/2016 11:28     Subject: Is there any basis for zodiac signs?

"Belief in astrology" = failed IQ test
Anonymous
Post 11/22/2016 11:12     Subject: Is there any basis for zodiac signs?

PP again. I thought I would also note that (somewhat like you OP) I am not surrounded by many Scorpios. So perhaps that comes into play with my preference for a Pisces water sign vs. a Scorpio water sign. Cancer water signs are touch and go with me, I love their strength, intuition, and deep appreciation for connection and meaningful relationships, but sometimes their insecurity and modus operandi conflict with a Gemini's style.
Anonymous
Post 11/22/2016 11:09     Subject: Is there any basis for zodiac signs?

I'm a Gemini too, an air sign (communication/motivation) and I definitely think there is an underlying commonality, which people can choose to change, but are still predisposed too.

Pisces are water (feeling/nurturing) signs, deep, feeling, intuitive people, who are very intelligent and sensitive. They can mope, or be self-pitying, but also have a wonderful sense of humor. My best friend, and a number of relatives are Pisces.

Oddly, I don't get along very well with Scorpios (water). They are a little too boisterous for me.

Anonymous
Post 11/22/2016 11:05     Subject: Is there any basis for zodiac signs?

I used to think it was nonsense, but I've seen multiple articles about how one's birth month/season has some affect on one's susceptibility to certain allergies, etc. If season of birth can have a physical effect, there may be factors affecting personality. But the answer is almost certainly supportable by science, and has no mystical/supernatural component.
Anonymous
Post 11/22/2016 11:04     Subject: Is there any basis for zodiac signs?

Everyone has a dark side.

Astrology is fun but ultimately vague enough to accommodate all.
Anonymous
Post 11/22/2016 11:02     Subject: Is there any basis for zodiac signs?

Yes. It is the fulcrum allowing people to easily pry money from fools.
Anonymous
Post 11/22/2016 10:53     Subject: Is there any basis for zodiac signs?

No. But it is fun.
Anonymous
Post 11/22/2016 10:46     Subject: Is there any basis for zodiac signs?

I keep running into this. I am a gemini and most of my close friends are scorpios. We just seem to click. Now starting to get involved with a pisces man who seems wonderful but sometime show a brief hint of a dark side. I look back on everyone in my family and friends and I don't know any pisces at all. I may have worked with them in the past and didn't know it but this is the first one I have ever known and that may be why I am drawn to him, very different from others I know. I don't believe gemini gets along well with pisces. Any basis to this at all?