Anonymous wrote:Glad you all have something to keep you busy. Seems as if many of you have a lot of time on your hands.
Alas, your efforts will be in vain. Bannon does not require Senate approval.
Just so you know.... many of us were not happy with Rahm Emmanuel (chief of staff) or Valerie Jarrett or even John Podesta (under Clinton).
But, because these people are appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the president, the public doesn’t get much say in these positions.
Anonymous wrote:Glad you all have something to keep you busy. Seems as if many of you have a lot of time on your hands.
Alas, your efforts will be in vain. Bannon does not require Senate approval.
Just so you know.... many of us were not happy with Rahm Emmanuel (chief of staff) or Valerie Jarrett or even John Podesta (under Clinton).
But, because these people are appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the president, the public doesn’t get much say in these positions.
Anonymous wrote:Remember the good old days, when not paying taxes on your nanny was so shocking that you weren't qualified for an appointment?
thanks for the post OP
Anonymous wrote:Glad you all have something to keep you busy. Seems as if many of you have a lot of time on your hands.
Alas, your efforts will be in vain. Bannon does not require Senate approval.
Just so you know.... many of us were not happy with Rahm Emmanuel (chief of staff) or Valerie Jarrett or even John Podesta (under Clinton).
But, because these people are appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the president, the public doesn’t get much say in these positions.
Anonymous wrote:Good idea!! Bump!! Calling now.