Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:c) Fascist twit

How is he fascist? I don't think you know what that word means.

He's on record saying admiring thing about the Nazis in the 1930s.

Anonymous wrote:c) Fascist twit

How is he fascist? I don't think you know what that word means.

Anonymous wrote:they'be built their monarchies on the backs of the third world colonies. all this romanticism is so disturbing. like PP said, give me a break.

and you don't think a lot of those "third world" colonies wouldn't have been better off had they stayed colonies of European counties. Zimbabwe for example? Hell even India might be better off. Read "behind the beautiful forevers" if you want to know how awful it is.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:c) Fascist twit

And selfish and self-indulgent

In retrospect, thank goodness he took himself out of the picture.

Yes, yes, and yes. And PP is correct, he didn't live a meaningful life.

And royalty is also a product of inbreeding. It really shows.

The Duchess did have some fabulous jools!

they'be built their monarchies on the backs of the third world colonies. all this romanticism is so disturbing. like PP said, give me a break.

I think royalty is a total sham in the year 2016. Chosen by God to rule over other people? Give me a break.

Anonymous wrote:Both: selfish and brave. From other reading I've done on the subject, I think people agree that Wallis was more of an excuse than the whole reason. He didn't want to be king. And you have to admit, it's an extreme anachronism in the modern age. He only gets one life to. Should he spend it in a situation he hates?

It's not as if he aspired to or went on to live a more meaningful life.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:c) Fascist twit

And selfish and self-indulgent

In retrospect, thank goodness he took himself out of the picture.

Both: selfish and brave. From other reading I've done on the subject, I think people agree that Wallis was more of an excuse than the whole reason. He didn't want to be king. And you have to admit, it's an extreme anachronism in the modern age. He only gets one life to. Should he spend it in a situation he hates?

Interesting that the show creators seem to be hinting that QEII didn't really want to do it at first either. Wonder how accurate that is. Now people say she is all about duty.

I would very much recommend reading "That Woman: The Life of Wallis Simpson, Duchess of Windsor" by Anne Sebba. It gives a thorough account of Wallis' life and suggests that Edward was far more interested in marrying her than she was in marrying him. He seemed to be a rather foolish and stubborn individual.

I just started the show. I think it was a dumb move and one he regretted later in life. I also think it's sad that he didn't really have a relationship with his family after. And Wallace was not a good choice.

Anonymous wrote:c) Fascist twit

And selfish and self-indulgent

c) Fascist twit

Anyone watching The Crown? So good! What are your thoughts on what Edward VIII? Selfish and self indulgent or brave and modern?