Not a single person addressed OP's points on a substantive basis. Fact is, Holt did ask Trump several questions about scandals/gotcha (his tax returns). Yet, he did not ask Hillary questions about e-mails or any of her scandals. That was not even-handed, at all, in terms of selecting topics. If you're going to ask questions about things that are not on substantive policy topics than you have to ask the candidates evenly.

Anonymous wrote:I don't like HRC, but I'm so sick of the whining from Trump supporters. Why is it when people are poor or sick or have bad circumstances, republicans say that life isn't fair and those people should take personal responsibility and pull themselves up by their bootstraps, but the world should be absolutely fair to Trump? Get over yourselves.

Because they fascist hypocrites with zero moral fiber.

Anonymous wrote:I don't like HRC, but I'm so sick of the whining from Trump supporters. Why is it when people are poor or sick or have bad circumstances, republicans say that life isn't fair and those people should take personal responsibility and pull themselves up by their bootstraps, but the world should be absolutely fair to Trump? Get over yourselves.

We're not talking about the WORLD being fair to Trump. We are saying that a moderator should approach a modicum of objectivity, rather than lob one gotcha question after another to one candidate, and steering clear of questions addressing any the multitude of scandals of the other.

Anonymous wrote:I don't like HRC, but I'm so sick of the whining from Trump supporters. Why is it when people are poor or sick or have bad circumstances, republicans say that life isn't fair and those people should take personal responsibility and pull themselves up by their bootstraps, but the world should be absolutely fair to Trump? Get over yourselves.

To be fair, they couldn't have anticipated a rigged microphone.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Unfair to Hillary because he let Trump interrupt

Unfair to Trump because he pre-selected three questions (taxes, comments about women, housing discrimination) that were Trump scandals, but did not pose one such question to Hillary (emails, Benghazi, other various scandals).

Discuss.

His career is going nowhere after this epic failure.

I'm sure Lester is standing by for his pink slip.

Whaaaaaaaa.

I don't like HRC, but I'm so sick of the whining from Trump supporters. Why is it when people are poor or sick or have bad circumstances, republicans say that life isn't fair and those people should take personal responsibility and pull themselves up by their bootstraps, but the world should be absolutely fair to Trump? Get over yourselves.

Anonymous wrote:Unfair to Hillary because he let Trump interrupt

Unfair to Trump because he pre-selected three questions (taxes, comments about women, housing discrimination) that were Trump scandals, but did not pose one such question to Hillary (emails, Benghazi, other various scandals).

Discuss.

If the debate topics were bad, the time to discuss would have been before the outcome of the debate.

Anonymous wrote:Unfair to Hillary because he let Trump interrupt

Unfair to Trump because he pre-selected three questions (taxes, comments about women, housing discrimination) that were Trump scandals, but did not pose one such question to Hillary (emails, Benghazi, other various scandals).

Discuss.

His career is going nowhere after this epic failure.

But I thought Trump won all the debate polls. What seems to be the complaint here?

Anonymous wrote:He was the 3rd debater and clearly on HRC's side.

Yes, the Republicans - like Holt - have traditionally been in the tank for the Clinton's, but especially Hillary.

He was the 3rd debater and clearly on HRC's side.

Anonymous wrote:Huh? Hillary brought up the point about housing discrimination. Holt had nothing to do with it.

The broader topic was race in America, which is a very timely and relevant issue facing our country.

Quick question: did the candidate know the 6 general topics that were to be covered ahead of the debate? I'm assuming so.

Yes, the public knew too

Huh? Hillary brought up the point about housing discrimination. Holt had nothing to do with it.

The broader topic was race in America, which is a very timely and relevant issue facing our country.

Quick question: did the candidate know the 6 general topics that were to be covered ahead of the debate? I'm assuming so.

Unfair to Hillary because he let Trump interrupt

Unfair to Trump because he pre-selected three questions (taxes, comments about women, housing discrimination) that were Trump scandals, but did not pose one such question to Hillary (emails, Benghazi, other various scandals).

Discuss.