Anonymous wrote:I care about both. They are not unrelated either. Transgender people face higher than average rates of sexual assault, and forcing them to use the bathroom assigned to the gender they were assigned at birth increases the risk
Anonymous wrote:The whole thing is ridiculous, Baylor rapes are much more serious.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guess what? You don't have to rank what you care about most. Both are important issues.
The analysis of it is more complicated than that. Yes, they're both important issues. But there it's undeniable that the media likes to focus on controversial issues rather than than root causes.
When celebrities and corporations are boycotting North Carolina because of the bathroom issue, why aren't they also mentioning the deplorable revocation of worker's rights? We know that the biggest risk factors of harm for transgender people are homelessness and unemployment/underemployment that often results in turning to prostitution for survival, which staggeringly multiplies the risk for harm.
So why the sole focus on the bathroom issue (which again, I'm not saying is unimportant) and not the issues that affect day-to-day survival? Because the bathroom issue is controversial, trendy, and a cheap way to declare your progressiveness (or on the opposite side, conservatism) without actually supporting root change.
Anonymous wrote:Rape is a bigger issue to me, but I don't really see how the two things are really comparable (I'm not too familiar with the Baylor thing, though, because I don't really follow college sports, so please feel free to educate me about it if you think that will change my mind). In the bathroom case, you have a very transparent law passed by the government, and a private organization is deciding whether it still wants to conduct business in that state as a result; because of the nature of legislation, there is no chance that law is going to be changed unless public pressure mounts through these kinds of actions. In the Baylor case, it sounds like the college broke the law in its handling of sexual assault cases (although that's only an allegation right now, not actually proven yet, whereas the NC law undeniably exists), but that the matter is proceeding through legal channels that will hopefully provide the kind of correction that doesn't exist for the N.C. law. Further, my understanding is that the allegations against Baylor don't actually violate NCAA regulations, so for the NCAA to do anything, it would mean punishing the college for conduct that wasn't actually prohibited by the organization; that's not generally a precedent that anyone wants to set. Of course, you can argue that the NCAA should amend its regulations to make these types of things actionable going forward, but making that apply retroactively doesn't usually square with most people's sense of fairness.
Anonymous wrote:Guess what? You don't have to rank what you care about most. Both are important issues.
Anonymous wrote:Guess what? You don't have to rank what you care about most. Both are important issues.
Anonymous wrote:The bathroom thing is very trendy right now. Rape has been around for a long time, so it doesn't get as much press.
I don't think they need to pull events for either reason.