Anonymous wrote:Is IQ testing even done much at all, other than as a diagnostic for folks with learning challenges, as part of a bigger assessment?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn't matter as much as executive functioning, social skills and athleticism. IQ will in general not be nearly as high as in MoCo Magnets but the kids are more well-rounded, more poise, etc. probably 130 on average, some lower, some higher.
No way is the avg 130.
Probably not. Having had kids at two different big 3 schools and one at BCC/Whitman/Churchill, not sure average IQ is useful. I think more meaningful would be the range of IQ. I think the range of IQ from the big 3 is much tighter and homogeneous, with a higher bottom and the same top end.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn't matter as much as executive functioning, social skills and athleticism. IQ will in general not be nearly as high as in MoCo Magnets but the kids are more well-rounded, more poise, etc. probably 130 on average, some lower, some higher.
No way is the avg 130.
Anonymous wrote:It doesn't matter as much as executive functioning, social skills and athleticism. IQ will in general not be nearly as high as in MoCo Magnets but the kids are more well-rounded, more poise, etc. probably 130 on average, some lower, some higher.
Anonymous wrote:It doesn't matter as much as executive functioning, social skills and athleticism. IQ will in general not be nearly as high as in MoCo Magnets but the kids are more well-rounded, more poise, etc. probably 130 on average, some lower, some higher.