Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I seem to recall a lot of divisive rhetoric, principally from the right, in Bush v. Gore, Bush v. Kerry and Obama v. Romney.
You are tone deaf if your think the divisive talk was primarily from the right. Gore and his supporters were insufferable.
Everyone treated Obama with kid gloves the first go around (not the second).
Both sides are equally guilty of this.
I guess being called a Muslim terrorist who hates America=kid gloves
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I seem to recall a lot of divisive rhetoric, principally from the right, in Bush v. Gore, Bush v. Kerry and Obama v. Romney.
You are tone deaf if your think the divisive talk was primarily from the right. Gore and his supporters were insufferable.
Everyone treated Obama with kid gloves the first go around (not the second).
Both sides are equally guilty of this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I seem to recall a lot of divisive rhetoric, principally from the right, in Bush v. Gore, Bush v. Kerry and Obama v. Romney.
You are tone deaf if your think the divisive talk was primarily from the right. Gore and his supporters were insufferable.
Everyone treated Obama with kid gloves the first go around (not the second).
Both sides are equally guilty of this.
Everyone treated Obama with kid gloves the first go around (not the second).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I seem to recall a lot of divisive rhetoric, principally from the right, in Bush v. Gore, Bush v. Kerry and Obama v. Romney.
You are tone deaf if your think the divisive talk was primarily from the right. Gore and his supporters were insufferable.
Everyone treated Obama with kid gloves the first go around (not the second).
Both sides are equally guilty of this.
Anonymous wrote:I seem to recall a lot of divisive rhetoric, principally from the right, in Bush v. Gore, Bush v. Kerry and Obama v. Romney.
takoma wrote:As two of the most disliked people in the country, Clinton and Trump split this country apart just by being the nominees. If they had any concern for the welfare of their country, they would get together in a joint resignation and leave us with a normal election. Whether the parties promoted Kaine and Pence, or went for their ideal candidates (Biden and Ryan, perhaps), I think we might actually be having sane discussions, here on DCUM and throughout the country, about the issues, rather than about how awful the other candidate and her/his supporters are.
Anonymous wrote:OP... when has there EVER been a sane discussion on this forum? I have been a regular reader of DCUM since 2012 and I could probably count on my two hands the number of reasonable, substantive discussions I have seen on this particular forum.
And also, Clinton and Trump are the candidates we deserve. We have vilified politicians to the point that at best only slightly deranged people enter public service. Our civil institutions are slowly dying. People are less and less involved in their communities. Until we snap out of it, this is how things are going to be.
Anonymous wrote:IDK, they were pretty cozy with each other in the past.Anonymous wrote:Well said, pp.Anonymous wrote:OP... when has there EVER been a sane discussion on this forum? I have been a regular reader of DCUM since 2012 and I could probably count on my two hands the number of reasonable, substantive discussions I have seen on this particular forum.
And also, Clinton and Trump are the candidates we deserve. We have vilified politicians to the point that at best only slightly deranged people enter public service. Our civil institutions are slowly dying. People are less and less involved in their communities. Until we snap out of it, this is how things are going to be.
And, it will be a cold day in hell before Clinton and Trump agree on anything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP... when has there EVER been a sane discussion on this forum? I have been a regular reader of DCUM since 2012 and I could probably count on my two hands the number of reasonable, substantive discussions I have seen on this particular forum.
And also, Clinton and Trump are the candidates we deserve. We have vilified politicians to the point that at best only slightly deranged people enter public service. Our civil institutions are slowly dying. People are less and less involved in their communities. Until we snap out of it, this is how things are going to be.
Well said, pp.
And, it will be a cold day in hell before Clinton and Trump agree on anything.
Anonymous wrote:OP... when has there EVER been a sane discussion on this forum? I have been a regular reader of DCUM since 2012 and I could probably count on my two hands the number of reasonable, substantive discussions I have seen on this particular forum.
And also, Clinton and Trump are the candidates we deserve. We have vilified politicians to the point that at best only slightly deranged people enter public service. Our civil institutions are slowly dying. People are less and less involved in their communities. Until we snap out of it, this is how things are going to be.